• The Collection
  • The Kangyur
  • Discipline
  • Chapters on Monastic Discipline

This rendering does not include the entire published text

The full text is available to download as pdf at:
https://read.84000.co/data/toh1-1_84000-the-chapter-on-going-forth.pdf

རབ་ཏུ་འབྱུང་བའི་གཞི།

The Chapter on Going Forth
Scaring Away a Crow

Pravrajyāvastu
འདུལ་བ་གཞི་ལས། རབ་ཏུ་འབྱུང་བའི་གཞི།
’dul ba gzhi las/ rab tu ’byung ba’i gzhi
“The Chapter on Going Forth” from The Chapters on Monastic Discipline
Vinayavastu Pravrajyāvastu
84000 logo

Toh 1-1

Degé Kangyur, vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 1.a–131.a

Translated by Robert Miller and team
under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha

First published 2018
Current version v 1.37.2 (2023)
Generated by 84000 Reading Room v2.18.4.1

84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha is a global non-profit initiative to translate all the Buddha’s words into modern languages, and to make them available to everyone.

Logo for the license

This work is provided under the protection of a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution - Non-commercial - No-derivatives) 3.0 copyright. It may be copied or printed for fair use, but only with full attribution, and not for commercial advantage or personal compensation. For full details, see the Creative Commons license.

Options for downloading this publication

This print version was generated at 2.46pm on Wednesday, 24th May 2023 from the online version of the text available on that date. If some time has elapsed since then, this version may have been superseded, as most of 84000’s published translations undergo significant updates from time to time. For the latest online version, with bilingual display, interactive glossary entries and notes, and a variety of further download options, please see
https://read.84000.co/translation/toh1-1.html.


co.

Table of Contents

ti. Title
im. Imprint
co. Contents
s. Summary
ac. Acknowledgements
i. Introduction
+ 10 sections- 10 sections
· The Vinaya
· The Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya
· The Vinayavastu
· The Chapter on Going Forth
· Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana’s Spiritual Search
· The Rite of Admission into the Renunciant Order
· Admission Criteria
· Academic Work and Prior Translations
· The Language of Renunciation
· The Translation
tr. The Translation
+ 8 sections- 8 sections
p. Prologue
1. Śāriputra
+ 4 chapters- 4 chapters
· Śāriputra
· Going Forth
· Granting Ordination
+ 3 sections- 3 sections
· The Early Rite
+ 3 sections- 3 sections
· The postulant’s request
· The monk’s request
· Acting on the motion
· Preceptors and Instructors
· The Present Day Ordination Rite
+ 4 sections- 4 sections
· Giving the layperson’s vows and refuge precepts
+ 2 sections- 2 sections
· How to give the layperson’s vows
· Pledging to keep the precepts
· Going forth
+ 3 sections- 3 sections
· Informing the saṅgha of the wish to go forth
· Requesting the preceptor
· Allowing the postulant’s going forth
· Becoming a novice
+ 3 sections- 3 sections
· Inducting the postulant into the novitiate
· Marking the time
· The novice investiture
· Granting ordination
+ 29 sections- 29 sections
· The opening occasion
· Requesting the preceptor
· Taking possession of robes that have already been cut and sewn
· Taking possession of robes that have not already been cut and sewn
· Displaying the begging bowl
· Taking possession of the begging bowl
· The privy advisor’s expression of willingness
· The motion to act as privy advisor
· The inquiry into private matters
· Reporting the findings
· The ordinand’s request for ordination
· The motion to ask about impediments before the saṅgha
· Inquiring into impediments before the Saṅgha
· The monk officiant’s request to ordain
· The motion to act
· Marking the time by the length of a shadow
· Explaining the different parts of the day and night
· Describing the length of the seasons
· Explaining the supports
· Explaining the offenses
· Explaining those things that constitute spiritual practice
· Announcing the perfect fulfillment of his greatest desire
· Enjoining him to practice the equally applicable ethical code
· Enjoining him to bond with his role model in the renunciant life
· Enjoining him to dwell in tranquility
· Enjoining him to carry out his obligations
· Informing him of what he must do to fully understand his unspoken commitments
· Enjoining him to heed what he reveres
· Enjoining him in the methods together with the instructions that should be practiced
· Querying Upasena
2. Tīrthikas
+ 3 chapters- 3 chapters
· Tīrthikas
· Twenty Years
· Novices Not Yet Fifteen
3. The Two Novices
+ 7 chapters- 7 chapters
· Two Novices
· Those in Servitude
· Debtors
· Those Without Consent
· Without Consultation
· Ill persons
· Śākyas
4. Scaring Away a Crow
+ 8 chapters- 8 chapters
· Scaring Away a Crow
· Violators
· Impostors
· Person labeled a paṇḍaka
· Creatures
+ 1 section- 1 section
· Saṅgharakṣita and the Shape-Shifting Nāga
+ 8 sections- 8 sections
· The shape-shifting nāga who finds faith in the Dharma
· Saṅgharakṣita brings the Buddha’s teachings to the land of the nāgas
· Saṅgharakṣita sees the effects of actions with his own eyes
· Saṅgharakṣita’s sermon leads five hundred seers to the truth
· Saṅgharakṣita leads an entourage of one thousand to the Buddha
· The Blessed One explains the causes for the sights Saṅgharakṣita has seen
· The Blessed One explains the reasons for Saṅgharakṣita’s good fortune
· The Blessed One explains the reasons for the shape-shifting nāga’s faith
· Tīrthikas
· Matricides
· Patricides
5. Killing an Arhat
+ 5 chapters- 5 chapters
· Killing an Arhat
· Causing a Schism in the Saṅgha
· Maliciously Drawing Blood from a Tathāgata
· Suffering One of the Four Defeats
· Three Types of Suspension
6. Persons whose hands have been cut off
+ 1 section- 1 section
· Persons whose hands have been cut off
c. Colophon
ap. An Outline of the Present Day Ordination Rite
ab. Abbreviations
n. Notes
b. Bibliography
+ 3 sections- 3 sections
· The Translated Text: “The Chapter on Going Forth”
· The Commentary to “The Chapter on Going Forth”
· Works Cited in Introduction and Endnotes
+ 2 sections- 2 sections
· Tibetan and Sanskrit Reference Works
· Works Cited in English and Other Languages
g. Glossary

s.

Summary

s.­1

“The Chapter on Going Forth” is the first of seventeen chapters in The Chapters on Monastic Discipline, a four-volume work that outlines the statutes and procedures that govern life in a Buddhist monastic community. This first chapter traces the development of the rite by which postulants were admitted into the monastic order, from the Buddha Śākyamuni’s informal invitation to “Come, monk,” to the more elaborate “Present Day Rite.” Along the way, the posts of preceptor and instructor are introduced, their responsibilities defined, and a dichotomy between elders and immature novices described. While the heart of the chapter is a transcript of the “Present Day Rite,” the text is interwoven with numerous narrative asides, depicting the spiritual ferment of the north Indian region of Magadha during the Buddha’s lifetime, the follies of untrained and unsupervised apprentices, and the need for a formal system of tutelage.


ac.

Acknowledgements

ac.­1

This translation was carried out from the Tibetan by Robert Miller with the guidance of Geshé Tséwang Nyima. Ven. Lhundup Damchö (Dr. Diana Finnegan) provided her draft translation of the extant Sanskrit portions of this chapter. Dr. Fumi Yao and Maurice Ozaine kindly identified numerous misspellings and mistakes in the glossaries. Both Ven. Damchö and Dr. Yao generously shared their extensive knowledge of the Mūlasarvāstivādin Vinaya and furnished invaluable assistance in researching the translation. Matthew Wuethrich served as style consultant and editor.

The translation was completed under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha.


ac.­2

The generous sponsorship of Zhou Tian Yu, Chen Yi Qin, Irene Tillman, Archie Kao, and Zhou Xun, which helped make the work on this translation possible, is most gratefully acknowledged.


i.

Introduction

The Vinaya

i.­1

According to traditional accounts, after the Buddha had entered parinirvāṇa, the elder Kāśyapa proposed that the Blessed One’s teachings be recited for posterity. During the rains retreat at Rājagṛha that followed, Kāśyapa asked the venerable Upāli to recall the Buddha’s pronouncements on monastic discipline and the venerable Ānanda to recite the Buddha’s discourses. One hundred years later, a second council was convened at Vaiśālī to resolve disagreements that had arisen in relation to the code of monastic discipline, or vinaya.1

The Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya

The Vinayavastu

The Chapter on Going Forth

Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana’s Spiritual Search

The Rite of Admission into the Renunciant Order

Admission Criteria

Academic Work and Prior Translations

The Language of Renunciation

The Translation


The Translation
The Chapters on Monastic Discipline
The Chapter on Going Forth

p.

Prologue

[F.1.b]


p.­1
In the language of India, this scripture is called Vinayavastu.
In the language of Tibet, it is called Dulwa Shi. [B1]
p.­2
Homage to the Three Jewels.
p.­3
Homage to him who severed the bonds,
Destroyed the whole host of tīrthikas,
Vanquished the armies of Māra,
And thus discovered this awakening.
p.­4
At first to renounce a householder’s concerns and go forth is hard.
For a hedonist to be happy among renunciants is hard.
For the joyful set on perfection to act perfectly is hard.
For a learned wearer of the saffron robes to fall is hard.

1.

Śāriputra

1.­1
The Śāriputra section is told over five chapters:
Śāriputra, going forth, refuge, a summary of Upasena’s collection, and a summary of the fives.

Śāriputra

1.­2

While the Bodhisattva was dwelling in the Abode of Tuṣita, the King of Aṅga ruled over the lands of Aṅga. Under his rule, the kingdom prospered and thrived, crops were bountiful and the land teemed with animals and people. Meanwhile, King Mahāpadma ruled over the lands of Magadha. Under his rule, the kingdom prospered and thrived, crops were bountiful and the land teemed with animals and people. At times, the King of Aṅga and his armies were dominant. At other times, King Mahāpadma and his armies were dominant.

Going Forth

Granting Ordination

The Early Rite

The postulant’s request

The monk’s request

Acting on the motion

Preceptors and Instructors

The Present Day Ordination Rite

Giving the layperson’s vows and refuge precepts

How to give the layperson’s vows

Pledging to keep the precepts

Going forth

Informing the saṅgha of the wish to go forth

Requesting the preceptor

Allowing the postulant’s going forth

Becoming a novice

Inducting the postulant into the novitiate

Marking the time

The novice investiture

Granting ordination

The opening occasion

Requesting the preceptor

Taking possession of robes that have already been cut and sewn

Taking possession of robes that have not already been cut and sewn

Displaying the begging bowl

Taking possession of the begging bowl

The privy advisor’s expression of willingness

The motion to act as privy advisor

The inquiry into private matters

Reporting the findings

The ordinand’s request for ordination

The motion to ask about impediments before the saṅgha

Inquiring into impediments before the Saṅgha

The monk officiant’s request to ordain

The motion to act

Marking the time by the length of a shadow

Explaining the different parts of the day and night

Describing the length of the seasons

Explaining the supports

Explaining the offenses

Explaining those things that constitute spiritual practice

Announcing the perfect fulfillment of his greatest desire

Enjoining him to practice the equally applicable ethical code

Enjoining him to bond with his role model in the renunciant life

Enjoining him to dwell in tranquility

Enjoining him to carry out his obligations

Informing him of what he must do to fully understand his unspoken commitments

Enjoining him to heed what he reveres

Enjoining him in the methods together with the instructions that should be practiced

Querying Upasena


2.

Tīrthikas

2.­1

A summary:

Tīrthikas, twenty years, and
Novices not yet fifteen.

Tīrthikas

2.­2

[F.72.a] The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when an elder who was immature, dense, dim-witted, and unskilled allowed a follower of another tīrthika tradition to go forth. The elder granted the tīrthika ordination, sparking a number of disputes between monks. After the tīrthika had offered back his training and returned to his community of tīrthikas, the monks asked the Blessed One about it. This is how he responded: “Monks, look at how that benighted man has turned his back on such a fine and well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya and returned to his community of tīrthikas. Monks, it seems to me he is behaving like a dog, wracked by hunger, but refusing fine food and fare and eating excrement instead. Monks, this is how a benighted man acts who turns his back on such a fine and well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya and returns to his former community of tīrthikas.”

Twenty Years

Novices Not Yet Fifteen


3.

The Two Novices

3.­1

A summary:

The chapters are of two novices,
Those in servitude, debtors,
Those without consent,
Without consultation, ill persons, and the Śākyas.

Two Novices

3.­2

The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when two of Upananda’s novices, Kaṇṭaka and Mahaka, flirted with, groped, and tickled one another. They acted as a man does with a woman, or as a woman does with a man. Once, when they were behaving like this, the monks asked the Blessed One about it, and the Blessed One thought, “All those shortcomings ensue from monks placing two novices together.”

Those in Servitude

Debtors

Those Without Consent

Without Consultation

Ill persons

Śākyas


4.

Scaring Away a Crow

4.­1

A summary:

Scaring away a crow, violators,
Impostors, person labeled a paṇḍaka,
Creatures, tīrthikas,
Matricides, and patricides.

Scaring Away a Crow

4.­2

The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when the ignorant Virūḍhaka had slaughtered the Śākya inhabitants of Kapilavastu, although they had not been aggressive, antagonistic, or thieving. The two sons of the venerable Ānanda’s younger sister were left orphaned, and were wandering aimlessly when traders from Śrāvastī on their way to Kapilavastu on business recognized the two good-looking lads and asked, “Boys, where are your parents?”

“They were killed by the ignorant Virūḍhaka,” they replied.

4.­3

“If your uncle, the famous monk known as reverend Ānanda, is staying in Śrāvastī, why don’t you go there?”

They replied, “Who would take us there?”

“We will take you.”

4.­4

After they traded their goods and made a profit, the traders set out for Śrāvastī with the two boys in tow. They left the boys at the gate of Jetavana, where the venerable Ānanda recognized them and asked, “Boys, where are your parents?”

“They were killed by the ignorant Virūḍhaka.”

4.­5

Because Ānanda cared for his kin, on hearing of their death he became choked with tears.

The monks asked him, “Venerable Ānanda, who are these two lads?”

“They are my sister’s boys.”

4.­6

“Why don’t you take them in?”

“I barely get enough from begging to fill my own stomach,” he replied. “Where out there can I get enough to provide for them?”

“If these two boys offer the monks herbs, [F.85.a] flowers, and fruits, in return the monks will give them the leftovers from their begging bowls.”

4.­7

After being taken in, the boys began to offer the monks herbs, flowers, and fruits, and in return the monks gave them the leftovers from their begging bowls. After a few days of giving the two their leftovers, they stopped. So Ānanda went out and about begging alms, but received only just enough to fill his own stomach. Eating half himself and giving the other half to the two boys, he became pallid, emaciated, feeble, withered, thin, and weak.

4.­8

Although they know, blessed buddhas may inquire about what they already know. Though they already know, they may inquire‍—or, even though they know, they may not inquire. They inquire when the time is right, not when the time has passed. Their inquiries are meaningful, not meaningless. In this way blessed buddhas dam the flow of meaningless inquiries.

4.­9

As blessed buddhas know the time for a meaningful inquiry, the Blessed Buddha asked the monks, “Monks, why has the monk Ānanda become pallid, emaciated, feeble, withered, thin, and weak?”

4.­10

“Blessed One,” they replied, “since the two sons of the venerable Ānanda’s younger sister were orphaned, he has gone out receiving only enough alms to fill his own mouth,161 half of which he takes for himself while the other half he gives to them. This has reduced the venerable Ānanda to such a state.”

4.­11

The Blessed One then asked the venerable Ānanda, “Will you not allow these two boys’ going forth?” [F.85.b]

“Blessed One, I will allow their going forth.”

4.­12

The Blessed One decreed, “In light of that, I give permission for food given to the saṅgha to be given to those wishing to go forth.”

4.­13

After the Blessed One gave permission for food that has been given to the saṅgha to be given to those wishing to go forth, the monks gave them food for a few days and then began to complain. The Blessed One then asked Ānanda a second time, “Did you refuse to allow these two boys’ going forth?”

“Reverend, the two of them are not yet fifteen.”

4.­14

“Can the two boys scare crows away from the saṅgha’s sleeping quarters?”

“Reverend, they can throw stones.”

“In that case, Ānanda, I give my permission to allow freely the going forth of those as young as seven years old, provided they can scare away crows.”

Ānanda then allowed the two to go forth.

4.­15

After Ānanda’s nephews went forth, Ānanda began to teach them to read, but after a few days of study they began to misbehave. The venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana asked Ānanda, “Why do you not make these two novices study?”

“Elder,” replied Ānanda, “they do not listen to me. I do not know what to do, but I must compel these two novices to study.”

4.­16

Mahāmaudgalyāyana replied, “Elder, do as you say.”

So Ānanda began to make the two novices study. But again, after a few days, the two of them began to misbehave, and Ānanda asked Mahāmaudgalyāyana, “Elder, why can I not make these two novices study?”

“Ānanda, these two will not yet listen to me either.”

“Elder, the two novices must be given a little scare.”

4.­17

The venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana said to the two, “Novices, [F.86.a] let’s do our daily practice.”

“Yes, noble one.”

“Bring something to sit on.”

4.­18

Mahāmaudgalyāyana then took the two novices for their daily practice. On the way, Mahāmaudgalyāyana conjured up an apparition of beings in the hell realms, who cried out from being cut, sliced, crushed, and hacked to pieces.

The two boys exclaimed, “Noble one, what is this?”

“Have a closer look,” he replied.

4.­19

The two of them approached and found what was being done there‍—the cutting, the slicing, the crushing, and the hacking to pieces. Some were being sliced apart by saws, some were being ground in mills, and some were being melted down in boiling vats. When they saw two boiling iron vats standing there empty, they asked, “Gentlemen, will no one be put into these two?”

4.­20

“No,” they replied. “For the two sons of noble Ānanda’s sister have gone forth and yet lazily pass their time. When their time has come and they die, they will be reborn here, so these two vats have been reserved for them.”

Terrified, they thought, “If we’re recognized, they’ll put us in those vats this very day,” and began to look all about them. They went to Mahāmaudgalyāyana, who asked, “Did you see something?”

“Noble one, we did.”

4.­21

“What?”

“Beings in the hell realms.”

“What were they doing there?”

4.­22

“They were doing all sorts of things‍—cutting, slicing, crushing, hacking to pieces,” they replied. “There, some were being sliced apart by saws, some were being ground in mills, and some were being melted down in boiling vats. [F.86.b] When we saw two boiling iron vats standing empty, we asked, ‘Gentlemen, will no one be put into these two?’ And they replied, ‘No. For the two sons of noble Ānanda’s sister have gone forth and yet lazily pass their time. When their time has come and they die, they’ll be reborn here, so these two have been reserved for them.’ ”

4.­23

Then Mahāmaudgalyāyana advised, “Thus, novices, knowing that disadvantages such as these, and others too, accrue from laziness, apply yourselves diligently.”

4.­24

The two nephews began to apply themselves to their studies with diligence. If they thought of the beings in the hell realms in the morning, they would not even eat; if they thought of them in the afternoon, they would vomit up what they had eaten. Thus it was that the two of them became pallid, emaciated, feeble, withered, thin, and weak.

4.­25

Mahāmaudgalyāyana said, “Ānanda, the two have become dispirited.”

“Elder, now they must be inspired.”

Mahāmaudgalyāyana said to the two, “Novices, let’s go for our daily practice.”

“Noble one,” they replied, “we will go, but we will not return to that one place.”

“Bring something to sit on.”

4.­26

Mahāmaudgalyāyana then took the two novices for their daily practice. On the way, Mahāmaudgalyāyana conjured up an apparition of the gods, along with the sounds of the vīṇā, ektara, balari, mahāti, and the sughoṣak.162

4.­27

The two boys exclaimed, “Noble one, what is this?”

“Have a closer look,” he replied.

The two of them approached and followed the sounds of the vīṇā, ektara, balari, mahāti, and the sughoṣak to where there stood two palaces strewn with beds and divans replete with goddesses. Seeing no gods in either palace, they inquired, “Mistresses, [F.87.a] are there no gods in either of these palaces?”

“No, there are none.”

4.­28

“Why is that?”

“The two sons of noble Ānanda’s sister have gone forth, and since they act and apply themselves diligently, when their time has come and they die, they will be reborn here, so these two have been reserved for them.”

4.­29

Overjoyed, they went to Mahāmaudgalyāyana, who again asked, “Did you see something?”

“Noble one, we did.”

“What?”

“Gods.”

4.­30

“What were they doing?”

“We could hear the sounds of the vīṇā, ektara, balari, mahāti, and the sughoṣak, and found two palaces strewn with beds and divans replete with goddesses, who said, ‘The two sons of noble Ānanda’s sister have gone forth, and since they act and apply themselves diligently, when their time has come and they die, they will be reborn here, so these two have been reserved for them.’ ”

4.­31

Then Mahāmaudgalyāyana advised, “Thus, novices, knowing that advantages such as these, and others too, accrue from diligence, apply yourselves.” [B8]

The two of them began to apply themselves to their studies and receive instructions. After a time, they came across the following passage in the Nidānasaṃyukta:163


4.­32

Then, taking dirt from the tip of his fingernail, the Blessed One asked the monks, “Monks, what do you think? Which is more, the dirt I take from the tip of my fingernail or the dirt that is upon this earth?” [F.87.b]

4.­33

“Reverend, the dirt the Blessed One takes from the tip of his fingernail is less, much less, a great deal less, entirely less. If we used those specks to produce all the dirt on the earth, it would not amount to even one hundredth, it would not amount to one thousandth of it, or one hundred thousandth of it; it would not equal, match, number, compare to, or cause it.”

4.­34

“Monks,” the Blessed One replied, “sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among hell realm beings only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among hell realm beings and are reborn among humans.

4.­35

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among hell realm beings only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among hell realm beings and are reborn among humans.

4.­36

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among hell realm beings only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among hell realm beings and are reborn among humans.

4.­37

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among hell realm beings only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among hell realm beings and are reborn among gods.

4.­38

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among hell realm beings [F.88.a] only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among hell realm beings and are reborn among gods.

4.­39

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among hell realm beings only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among hell realm beings and are reborn among gods.

4.­40

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among animals only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among animals and are reborn among humans.

4.­41

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among animals only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among animals and are reborn among humans.

4.­42

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among animals only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among animals and are reborn among humans.

4.­43

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among animals only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among animals and are reborn among gods.

4.­44

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among animals only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while [F.88.b] sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among animals and are reborn among gods.

4.­45

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among animals only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among animals and are reborn among gods.

4.­46

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among spirits only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among spirits and are reborn among humans.

4.­47

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among spirits only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among spirits and are reborn among humans.

4.­48

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among spirits only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among spirits and are reborn among humans.

4.­49

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among spirits only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among spirits and are reborn among gods.

4.­50

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among spirits only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail [F.89.a] die among spirits and are reborn among gods.

4.­51

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among spirits only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among spirits and are reborn among gods.

4.­52

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among gods only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among gods and are reborn among gods.

4.­53

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among gods only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among gods and are reborn among gods.

4.­54

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among gods only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among gods and are reborn among gods.

4.­55

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among humans only to be reborn among hell realm beings, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among humans and are reborn among humans.

4.­56

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among humans only to be reborn among animals, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among humans and are reborn among humans. [F.89.b]

4.­57

“Sentient beings equal in number to the particles of dirt on the earth die among humans only to be reborn among spirits, while sentient beings equal in number only to the particles of dirt on the tip of my fingernail die among humans and are reborn among humans.”


4.­58

Upon reciting this chapter, called “Repeating Like a Wheel,” the two boys asked Mahāmaudgalyāyana, “Noble one, will we too die among gods and humans only to be reborn among hell realm beings, animals, and spirits?”

4.­59

“Gentlemen, so long as the continuum of disturbing emotions remains uninterrupted, you must spin like a waterwheel through the cycle of five migrations.”

Disheartened, they spoke this verse:

4.­60
“Being a god, who cannot stay a god, is no good.
Being a human, whose life is short, is no good.
Being in saṃsāra, where there is no peace, is no good.
That is why, said the Sugata, nirvāṇa is supreme.
4.­61

“Noble one, henceforth, come what may, as we cycle through saṃsāra we must avoid engaging with such disturbing emotions, so please, we ask that you teach us the Dharma.”

4.­62

Mahāmaudgalyāyana knew their thoughts, their tendencies, their characters, and their natures. Drawing on all he had heard, he taught them the Dharma so that they abandoned all disturbing emotions and actualized arhatship, becoming arhats free of attachment to the three realms, for whom filth was equal to gold, who knew space like the palm of their hands, whose emotions had been cooled as if treated by a balm of sandalwood, whose knowledge had rent open the shell. They attained knowledge, clairvoyance, and discerning wisdom. They turned their backs on worldly gain, desires, and esteem and were venerated, honored, and saluted by Indra and the gods who attend him. [F.90.a]


4.­63

When the monks saw the two novices miraculously flying through the air, picking flowers, they asked one another, “Venerables, who are those two?”

One said, “They are the two novices, kin to Ānanda.”

4.­64

“Our begging bowls are black with wear. Our teeth are falling out and our hair turns grey, and yet we have not achieved even stillness of mind. Venerable, if these two were but seven years old when they went forth and yet abandoned all disturbing emotions and actualized arhatship, then the Blessed One spoke well when he said, ‘Ānanda, awakening is attained through diligence.’ ”

4.­65

In doubt, the monks went to he who severs all doubts, the Blessed Buddha, and asked, “Reverend, what actions have these two novices done that the fruition of such an act should lead them to go forth at the mere age of seven, and that the Blessed One exempted them alone from the vinaya guidelines he laid down for his disciples, allowing them to abandon all disturbing emotions and actualize arhatship?”

4.­66

The Blessed One responded, “Monks, these two themselves performed the actions‍—which have accrued a heap of karma, whose results have matured, which follow their course like an irrigation channel, which inevitably come to be‍—so who else will experience the actions they themselves have performed and accrued? Monks, actions which have been performed and accrued do not ripen upon the external elements. They do not ripen upon the element of water, upon the element of fire, nor upon the element of wind. Likewise, virtuous and non-virtuous actions which have been performed and accrued come to fruition upon the aggregates, elements, and seats of the senses of the one who performed them, for:

4.­67
“Actions never waste away,
Not even after one hundred eons.
When the time [F.90.b] and the conditions
Are right, they alight upon embodied beings.
4.­68

“Monks, earlier in this fortunate eon, when the lifespan of beings lasted twenty thousand years, there appeared in the world a teacher, a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened buddha, a knowledgeable and venerable one, a sugata, one who knew the world, an unsurpassed guide who tamed beings, a teacher to gods and men, the Blessed Buddha Kāśyapa.

4.­69

“With his following of twenty thousand monks, he lived and stayed in the Deer Park of Ṛṣipatana near Vārāṇasī. In Vārāṇasī there lived two householders and friends, who had wished to go forth in their youth, but had not received leave to go forth from their relatives. At a certain point, after their youth had faded, they abdicated in favor of their relatives and went forth into the teachings of the perfectly awakened Buddha Kāśyapa. As was natural given their junior status, they were always expected to perform errands, and so the monks would order them about, saying, ‘You two old-timers! Go do this!’ and ‘You two old-timers! Bring me that!’

4.­70

“One of them had a placid nature but the other was quick-tempered. Thus when the one became angry, the other would say, ‘Old-timer, if you couldn’t go forth when you were young, why get angry now?’

4.­71

“Though they lived the holy life for the remainder of their lives, they did not achieve any of the host of qualities. So later, as they died, they said this prayer: ‘We have lived the holy life for what remained of our lives under the Blessed One, the tathāgata, the arhat, the perfectly awakened Buddha, the hallowed and unsurpassed Kāśyapa, but we have achieved none of the host of qualities. Therefore, may the roots of virtue from having lived the holy life for what remained of our lives ensure that at the mere age of seven we go forth into the teachings of the Blessed Buddha Śākyamuni, whose coming has been foretold in a prophecy that the blessed tathāgata, the arhat, the perfectly awakened Buddha Kāśyapa gave to a wonderful brahmin boy: “In the future, when the lifespans of beings last one hundred years, you brahmin boy [F.91.a] will become the tathāgata, the arhat, the perfectly awakened Buddha, the knowledgeable and venerable one, the sugata, the one who knows the world, the unsurpassed guide who tames beings, the teacher to gods and men, the Blessed Buddha Śākyamuni.” And further, may the Blessed One exempt us alone from the vinaya guidelines he laid down for his disciples, allowing us to abandon all disturbing emotions and actualize arhatship.’

4.­72

“Monks, the two householders of that time are now these two novices. And due to the prayer that they made, they have gone forth at the mere age of seven, and I have exempted them alone from the vinaya guidelines I laid down for my disciples, allowing them to abandon all disturbing emotions and actualize arhatship.”

Violators

4.­73

While the Blessed Buddha was journeying and passing through Kāśī, he arrived at a place and smiled. As is natural, when blessed buddhas smile, blue, yellow, red, white, maroon, crystalline, and silvery rays of light emerge from their mouths, some streaming downwards and some streaming upwards.

4.­74

Those that streamed downwards proceeded to the hell realms of Sañjīva, Kālasūtra, Saṅghāta, Raurava, Mahāraurava, Tapana, Pratāpana, Avīci, Arbuda, [F.91.b] Nirarbuda, Aṭaṭa, Hahava, Huhuva, Utpala, Padma, and Mahāpadma. Alighting on and cooling those in the hot hells and alighting on and warming those in the cold hells, these rays of light interrupted the various harms inflicted on those hell realm beings, prompting the denizens of hell to think, “Gentlemen, what is this? Have we died, moved on, and taken birth elsewhere?”

4.­75

To engender faith in them, the Blessed One sent an emanation which, when they saw it, prompted them to think, “Gentlemen, we have not died and moved on, nor have we been born elsewhere. Rather, the various harms inflicted on us have been interrupted by a being we have never seen before.”

4.­76

Through the faith they felt in the emanation, the karma that led them to experience the hell realms was exhausted and they took rebirth as gods or humans, forms in which they became fit vessels for the truth.

4.­77

Those rays of light that streamed upwards reached the gods of Cāturmahārājika, Trāyastriṃśa, Yāma, Tuṣita Nirmāṇarati, Paranirmitavaśavartina, Brahmakāyikā, Brahmapurohita, Mahābrahman, Parīttābha Apramāṇābha Ābhāsvara, Parīttaśubha Apramāṇaśubha, Śubhakṛtsna, Anabhraka, Puṇyaprasava, Bṛhatphala, Abṛha, Atapa, Sudṛśa, Sudarśana, and Akaniṣṭha. Resonating with the words “impermanence,” “subject to suffering,” “empty,” and “selfless,” the rays of light proclaimed these two verses: [F.92.a]

4.­78
“Take action! Go forth!
Apply yourself to the Buddha’s teachings!
As an elephant does a mud hovel,
Destroy Yama’s minions!
He who with great care
Trains in the Dharma and Vinaya
Abandons the cycle of rebirth
And ends suffering once and for all!”
4.­79

The rays of light then unfurled through the worlds of the great billionfold universe, so that they would, in the future, be drawn into the Blessed One’s sphere. If the Blessed One was about to foretell actions of the past, the rays of light would fade into the space behind the Blessed One. If the Blessed One was about to foretell actions of the future, the rays of light would fade into the space before the Blessed One. If the Blessed One was about to foretell rebirth as a hell realm being, the rays of light would fade into the soles of his feet. If the Blessed One was about to foretell rebirth as an animal, the rays of light would fade into his ankle. If the Blessed One was about to foretell rebirth as a spirit, the rays of light would fade into his big toe. If the Blessed One was about to foretell rebirth as a human, the rays of light would fade into his knee. If the Blessed One was about to foretell a reign as a powerful king of the world, the rays of light would fade into the palm of his left hand. If the Blessed One was about to foretell a reign as a king of the world, the rays of light would fade into the palm of his right hand. If the Blessed One was about to foretell rebirth as a god, the rays of light would fade into his navel. If the Blessed One was about to foretell a śrāvaka’s awakening, the rays of light would fade into his mouth. If the Blessed One was about to foretell a pratyekabuddha’s awakening, the rays of light would fade into the tuft of hair at his brow. If the Blessed One was about to foretell unsurpassed, complete and perfect awakening, the rays of light would fade into the uṣṇīṣa at his crown.

4.­80

The rays of light then circled the Blessed One three times and faded into the soles of his feet. The venerable Ānanda then pressed his palms together and said to the Blessed One, “Reverend, not without cause or condition do tathāgatas, arhats, perfectly awakened buddhas [F.92.b] smile. If so, reverend, what then has caused you to smile? What condition has occasioned it?” And then he asked again in verse:

4.­81
“A mass made brilliant by a thousand colors
Emerged from your mouth,164
Illuminating every direction,
So why bother with a parasol?
Not brazen, nor dejected, nor self-satisfied,
You have become a buddha, the best of beings,
A victorious tamer of enemies. Not without cause
Do you flash a smile white like a conch or lotus root.
Your mind thus knows when the time is right to proclaim.165
Leader among sages! Sovereign among ascetics!
For your disciples who doubt,
Dispel their uncertainty with words
Reliable, sublime, and virtuous.
Steady as a mountain or the salty sea,
Lord buddhas do not smile accidentally.
Steady as you are, this group is eager to hear
The reason for your smile.”
4.­82

The Blessed One replied, “Ānanda, it is like this. Not without cause or condition do tathāgatas, arhats, perfectly awakened buddhas smile. Ānanda, a great many sinister men here have violated a great many nuns by bodily forcing themselves upon them. For this, when they die, they will pass from this life to be reborn among the denizens of hell.”

4.­83

A monk then went to where the Blessed One was, pressed his palms together and bowed, appealing to him in these words: “Reverend, I am one of the many sinister men who have bodily and forcibly violated nuns.”

“Fool, have you really committed this act?”

“Reverend, indeed I have.”

4.­84

The Blessed One then [F.93.a] decreed to the monks, “Monks, a person who has violated a nun will not take root in this Dharma and Vinaya.166 Therefore, monks, you must banish from this Dharma and the Vinaya those persons who have violated a nun. If someone wishing to go forth approaches any of you, you should ask, ‘You have not violated a nun, have you?’ If you allow going forth without asking this, a breach occurs.”

Impostors

4.­85

The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when a householder of Śrāvastī came to Jetavana.

4.­86

When monks are not free from desire, it leads to saṅgha stigmata offenses. Some incur offenses in their youth and then grow old, and others incur offenses in their maturity. When such an offense occurs, the monks who retain the sūtras, retain the vinaya, and retain the mātṛkā impose, in accordance with the Dharma, a sentence167 on the offender. The offender must serve the saṅgha while undergoing his full probation and penance. According to some, this service includes providing the saṅgha with drinks. According to others, it includes fanning them.

4.­87

At a certain point, the householder from Śrāvastī saw a spread of fine shelters with choice food laid out for the community and thought, “Though there is some good to their teaching, there are flaws too‍—they lack honor and respect for those elders they put to work.”

4.­88

When the group of six168 heard him say this, they asked, “What did you say, householder?”

“Noble ones, though there is some good to your teaching, you too have flaws.”

4.­89

“Householder, what are our flaws?”

“Noble ones,” he replied, “you lack honor and respect for the elders by putting them to work.”

4.­90

“There is a reason we put even elders to work.” [F.93.b]

“Noble ones, if I were to go forth, would you put me to work too?”

They replied, “What would you say if someone much more distinguished than you were to go forth and we put even him to work?”

The householder thought, “If I were to go forth, they would also put me to work. I must find some way around it.”

4.­91

As the householder was possessed of a natural intelligence, while in the monks’ company he learned how to conduct himself. Having learned that, he set off for a remote land, where he shaved off his hair and beard, donned saffron robes, and settled down.

4.­92

After a time, monks who were paying homage to stūpas passed by. When the pilgrims saw him they said, “Elder, in Śrāvastī there resides one who is verily a lord of Dharma. Around him, gods are always appearing in the flesh. Vast lights also appear, divine sounds are heard, as are the auguries of all-knowing beings, and the two forms of wealth‍—material wealth and the wealth of Dharma‍—are to be had. Why then do you not go to Śrāvastī?”

“Venerables, I shall remain right here.”

4.­93

They implored him again and again, “Elder, in Śrāvastī there verily resides a lord of Dharma. Around him always are gods appearing in the flesh. Vast lights also appear, divine sounds are heard, as are the auguries of all-knowing beings, and the two forms of wealth‍—material wealth and the wealth of Dharma‍—are to be had. Why then do you not go to Śrāvastī?”

4.­94

At the urging of his fellow brahmacārin, he set off for Śrāvastī. In time, he saw the spread of fine shelters with choice food laid out for the community there and thought, “If I sit in the front row, I’ll be called upon to demonstrate my knowledge.” Passing by the first seat, he sat down on the second. [F.94.a]

4.­95

When the all-knowing Kauṇḍinya arrived, he thought, “If the Blessed One declared that I am first among those who wear the monk’s mantle standard, then who is this?” On thinking it over, Kauṇḍinya saw that he was an impostor and dismissed him with a snap of his fingers. The venerable Aśvajit, Bhadrika, Vāṣpa, Mahānāman, Yaśas, Pūrṇa, Vimala, Gavāmpati, Subāhu, the venerable Śāriputra, the venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana, and all the eldest of elder monks then also dismissed him with the snap of their fingers.

4.­96

Some time later he approached the group of six, and they asked him, “Elder, how many years have you passed?”

“If you’re asking my age, I have seen sixty years,” he replied.

4.­97

They asked, “If the Blessed One himself has not passed sixty years, how could you?” And they asked him, “Old-timer, who is your preceptor?”

He replied, “Who is the ascetic Gautama’s preceptor?”

4.­98

They exclaimed, “Venerables, this old-timer claims he has taken up these signifiers on his own.”169 With this, they grabbed him by his arms and legs, dragged him before the senior monks and said, “Reverend saṅgha, please listen! If the Blessed One was the first self-ordained one in this world, this old-timer is the second. Or so he claims.” And with that they led him away.

4.­99

The Blessed One then addressed the monks: “Monks, this impostor will not take root in this Dharma and Vinaya; therefore, you must banish impostors from this Dharma and Vinaya. If someone wishing to go forth approaches any of you, ask him, ‘You are not an impostor, are you?’ If you allow going forth without asking this, a breach occurs.” [F.94.b]

4.­100

Venerable Upāli asked the Blessed One, “Reverend, if the Blessed One says an impostor should be excluded, then reverend, what constitutes an impostor?”

“Upāli, were he to later participate in the purification two or three times with monks of good standing, he would thereby be an imposter.”170

Person labeled a paṇḍaka

4.­101

The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when a brahmin living in Śrāvastī took a wife of equal caste and together they played with, took pleasure in, and amused one another. The wife with whom he had played, taken pleasure, and amused himself soon conceived a child. After eight or nine months, a paṇḍaka child was born who, though resembling a boy, was neither female nor male. Still, they nurtured and raised the child until it grew up.

4.­102

While the child was playing with a group of children, he showed them his sex organs, at which point they asked him, “What are you?”

He replied, “I’m a person labeled a paṇḍaka.”171

4.­103

“You’re a brahmin,” they said. “It’s not right to bring ill repute upon your family, so do not behave like this.”

They said to his parents, “You must stop this person labeled a paṇḍaka of yours from behaving like this.”

4.­104

His parents then said to him, “Person labeled a paṇḍaka, we are brahmins. It is not right to bring ill repute upon our family. Do not behave so.”

4.­105

Though this put a stop to that, the person labeled a paṇḍaka did not linger. He went to Jetavana and, after some time, he saw a group of young monks and thought, “If I were to go forth, they could play the role of a male for me while I could play the role of a female for them.” [F.95.a]

He then approached a monk and said, “Noble one, I want to go forth.”

4.­106

“Have your parents given you their permission?” asked the monk.

“They have not.”

4.­107

“Go and ask your parents.”

He went to his parents and said, “Father, Mother, I want to go forth.”

4.­108

Depressed, the two of them thought, “His going forth will require our parting with him.” Then they said to him, “Person labeled a paṇḍaka, we give you our permission.”

He went to the monk and said, “Noble one, my parents have given me permission, so please allow my going forth.”

4.­109

After his going forth was allowed and he was granted ordination, he exposed his sex organs in the presence of monks, whereupon they asked him, “What are you? A person labeled a paṇḍaka?”

4.­110

When he acknowledged that he was, the monks appealed to the Blessed One, and the Blessed One said to the monks, “A person labeled a paṇḍaka will not take root in this Dharma and Vinaya; therefore, you must banish people labeled paṇḍakas from this Dharma and Vinaya. If someone wishing to go forth approaches any of you, ask him, ‘You are not a person labeled a paṇḍaka, are you?’ If you allow going forth without asking this, a breach occurs.”

4.­111

“Monks, there are five kinds of persons labeled paṇḍakas. What are they? They are intersex persons, rhythmic-consecutive persons, sexually submissive persons, persons with a voyeuristic fetish, and persons with a sexual disability. What is a intersex person? One who is born neither a female nor a male. What is a rhythmic-consecutive person? Someone who is female for half the month yet becomes male during the other half. What is a sexually submissive person? One who becomes erect if embraced by another. What is a person with a voyeuristic fetish? One who becomes erect at the sight of others’ exertion. [F.95.b] What is a person with a sexual disability? A person whose sexual organs have been disabled by disease, or removed with some instrument.

4.­112

“If the first four types of persons labeled paṇḍakas‍—intersex persons, rhythmic-consecutive person, sexually submissive persons, and persons with a voyeuristic fetish‍—have not gone forth, you should not allow their going forth. If they have gone forth, they should be banished. As for a person with a sexual disability, if they have not gone forth, you should not allow their going forth. If they have gone forth, they should be left as they are, provided they do not show an inclination to change.172 If they show an inclination to change, they should be banished.”

Creatures

Saṅgharakṣita and the Shape-Shifting Nāga

The shape-shifting nāga who finds faith in the Dharma

4.­113

While the Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, the nāgas thrice felt fiery sand fall from the heavens upon them, reducing their bodies to mere skeletons. After fiery sand thrice fell from the heavens upon a young nāga, reducing his body to that of a mere skeleton, he asked his mother, “Mother, how long must I endure such suffering?”

“Son, for as long as you are in this life.”

4.­114

Through all of this, fiery sand had not fallen on other nāgas who possessed miraculous powers and great might, prompting him to ask, “Mother, why did it not fall upon them?”

His mother replied, “It did not fall upon them because they possess miraculous powers and great might; they live for eons and they sustain the earth. Even the garuḍa Suparṇi could not dislodge them.”

4.­115

Through all of this, fiery sand had not fallen on a number of scrawny nāgas either, prompting him to ask, “Mother, why did it not fall upon those of their type?”

“It did not fall upon them because they took refuge and adopted the precepts in the presence of the Blessed One.”

“If that is so, [F.96.a] then I too shall take refuge and adopt the precepts in the presence of the Blessed One.”

4.­116

“Son, a single life’s suffering is easy to bear, that of many lifetimes is not. If you take refuge and adopt the precepts in the presence of the Blessed One, but then do not properly heed them, you will have to endure suffering as a denizen in the hell realms for a long time to come.”

4.­117

The young nāga thought, “What suffering could be worse than my present suffering? I shall take refuge and adopt the precepts in the presence of the Blessed One.”

Conjuring up the appearance of a brahmin, he set off for Jetavana, where he saw monks applying themselves to and abiding in meditation, recitation, yoga, and concentration. Upon seeing them, he felt faith and thought, “Oh my! Should I first take refuge and adopt the precepts or go forth?”

4.­118

On thinking it over, he decided, “I shall go forth,” and with that he approached a monk and said, “Noble one, I want to go forth.”

“As I am new, you should go to someone else, an elder.”

“Noble one, I do not know anyone else. This is my first time in the presence of a noble being, so I ask you, please, introduce me to a monk.”

4.­119

As the new monk’s preceptor was a hermit living in the forest, the monk took the nāga disguised as a brahmin to see him and said, “Preceptor, as this noble son wants to go forth, I ask that you allow him to go forth.”

The preceptor replied, “My dear sir, the Blessed One said, ‘Monks, one could accept being pressed into work as a butcher, but it is not right to leave the life once you have gone forth and been ordained.’ This brahmin would go to the hells [F.96.b] and I too would fall, so I will not ordain him.”

4.­120

“Please, preceptor,” the monk replied, “all you need do is allow his going forth and I shall undertake to train and instruct him.”

After the preceptor had allowed the nāga’s going forth and ordained him, the preceptor said to the monk, “My dear sir, you and he now share a preceptor. As his instructor, you must quiz him, you must instruct him, and you must train him.”

4.­121

The monk recited the Ekottarikāgama173 and then had the nāga repeat it. As he did so with great vigor, it took on the cadence of a prayer. The monk instructor’s eyes lit up with joy and the monk said to the nāga disguised as a brahmin, “My dear sir, shall we seek alms together or on our own?”

4.­122

The nāga disguised as a brahmin thought, “I cannot live on the things humans eat; I had better return to the land of nāgas, where I can imbibe ambrosia, and return once I’ve eaten.”

“Instructor, let us seek them on our own.”

“Very well, my dear sir,” replied the monk.

4.­123

The nāga would drink the ambrosia of the gods in the land of nāgas and then return. As nāgas require a lot of sleep, he would soon fall into slumber. The monk would return later from his alms round as the nāga was rising from his nap.

4.­124

One day, the monk received alms right away, took them, and headed home. As he drew near, he heard a sound, like a smith pumping his bellows, coming from his hut. Looking through the keyhole, he saw the entire hut filled with the coiled up body of a nāga and cried out, “A shape shifter! A shape shifter!”

4.­125

Understanding well what such words meant, the nāga hastily transformed, cloaking his natural appearance and reverting to his conjured look. Monks gathered around and asked him, “What is the matter?”

“He’s a shape shifter,” the monk replied.

4.­126

They said, [F.97.a] “This venerable applies himself diligently, always making an effort in his recitations. Why do you begrudge him?”

“I do not begrudge him in the least. It is just that he’s a shape shifter.”

4.­127

While they were conferring, the Blessed One passed by and inquired, “What is the matter?”

“Blessed One, he’s a shape shifter.”

4.­128

The Blessed One replied, “A shape shifter will not take root in this Dharma and Vinaya; therefore, you must banish shape shifters from this Dharma and Vinaya. If someone wishing to go forth approaches any of you, ask him, ‘You are not a shape shifter, are you?’ If you allow going forth without asking this, a breach occurs.

4.­129

“Monks, a nāga’s nature is characterized by five things; the rest are emanations. What are these five? Nāgas are born a natural birth, they die a natural death, they sleep a natural sleep, they are nourished naturally, and they procreate naturally‍—these are the qualities they exhibit.”

The Blessed One said to the nāga, “My dear sir, with this body of yours you cannot attain any of a host of qualities, so leave and do no harm to the monks.”

4.­130

The nāga, not knowing where he might wind up, eventually came upon a forest of śāla trees, where he conjured up a monastery with a high gate, skylights, and latticed windows. It was adorned with balustrades, beguiling to the heart and beautiful to the eye, with a staircase to the upper level, and perfectly outfitted with beds, seats, and supplies. To arriving monks and departing monks, he provided all the supplies they needed.174

4.­131

After passing the rainy season at the monastery, an old-timer left for Śrāvastī, [F.97.b] where, as was their wont, the group of six disciples thought, “Here, it is we who teach the Dharma to the brahmins and householders that come and assemble. It is we who trounce our adversaries and it is we who spread the fame of our order.”

4.­132

As the group of six did whatever their self-appointed duties called for, they would never leave the gate into Jetavana unattended. Upananda rose early one morning, cast aside his toothbrush, donned his orange ceremonial robe, and took up his post at the gate into Jetavana. When he saw, approaching off in the distance, an old-timer with a head as white as an āgati flower and drooping eyebrows, Upananda thought, “No doubt this is one of our elder monks.”

4.­133

Going out to greet him, he said, “Welcome, elder, welcome.”

“Homage to you, instructor,” replied the old-timer.

4.­134

Upananda thought, “My! Why, I don’t recognize this old-timer as one of our instructors, nor do I recognize him as one of our preceptors.”

4.­135

Upananda then asked him, “Old-timer, where have you come from?”

“From the śāla forest.”

4.­136

“Why? Is there a monastery there?”

“Yes, there is.”

4.­137

“What type is it?”

“Oh, it is but a poor one.”

4.­138

“What is it like? How is it poor? If it is fully outfitted, it is a monastery, but if it lacks all the trappings, it is poor.”

“It is a monastery.”

4.­139

“What’s there?”

“A monk caretaker lives there and provides arriving monks and departing monks with all the supplies they need.”

4.­140

As was their wont, when one among the group of six heard the slightest news they all gathered in the afternoon to discuss it. So Upananda went to the assembly hall and said to the group of six, “We venerables must put off our other business for a time.”

4.­141

“Have you heard some news?”

“Indeed I have. There is a monastery in the śāla forest.” [F.98.a]

4.­142

“What’s there?”

“A monk caretaker lives there and provides arriving monks and departing monks with all the supplies they need. Come, let us pay a visit.”

4.­143

The expelled nāga, who was now disguised as an elderly monk caretaker, saw the six approaching from off in the distance, and thought, “So those rogues have come here. How would they treat me if I were to provide them with all the supplies they need?”

4.­144

With that thought, he allocated, in order of seniority, canopied beds and terraced cottages and provided them with all the supplies they needed.

4.­145

A few days after they had settled in, they said, “Nanda and Upananda, this old-timer has no obvious source of income, nor any obvious record of allocations. We should make him account for what is here.”

4.­146

They said to him, “Old-timer, you have no obvious source of income, nor any obvious record of allocations. Come and account for them.”

4.­147

“Noble ones,” he replied, “are you merely displeased or utterly disappointed?”

“We are not just ‘merely displeased,’ for our fellow brahmacārin would denounce us if it were said, ‘The group of six passed the rainy season at that very monastery and yet they know nothing of its income and know nothing of its allocations.’ ”

4.­148

“Elders, I will comply. How long must I keep records? Twelve years?”

“Old-Timer, in twelve years even the doors of this temple will have collapsed.”

4.­149

“How about seven years?”

“That’s impracticable.”

4.­150

“How about seven months?”

“Still impracticable.”

4.­151

“How about seven days?”

The group declared, “Nanda and Upananda, record whatever supplies this old-timer receives over the next seven days. Old-timer, [F.98.b] we order you to comply.”

4.­152

The nāga, disguised as the old-timer, thought, “I shall make this monastery disappear once the seven-day period is up.”

To some of our poorer fellow brahmacārin, the nāga proceeded to offer mantles, to some upper robes, to some under robes, to some undershirts, to some begging bowls, and to some small plates.175

4.­153

When the group of six saw this they said, “Nanda and Upananda, investigate this old-timer and after seven days, evict him along with his partisans.”

After seven days had passed, the old-timer made the monastery vanish as the group of six slept, and fled to the seashore.

The group of six, who awoke from their sleep on a piece of dry ground, said, “Nanda and Upananda, get up and fetch some chalk so we may check the accounts.”

4.­154

When they noticed they had been sleeping on a piece of dry ground, they realized, “We have opposed one who trusted in the Blessed One and served the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha, causing him to flee and make his monastery disappear.”

4.­155

When the monks asked the Blessed One, “Who was this being? A god, a nāga, a yakṣa?” the Blessed One replied, “That monk caretaker was a shape shifter and yet this was so: if the group of six had not opposed him, he would have served the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha for as long as the teachings remained.”

4.­156

The Blessed One reflected, “All those shortcomings ensue from the monks’ forcing him to account for the monastery’s income and allocations that had no obvious source or recipient.”

4.­157

The Blessed One then decreed, “A monk should not be forced to account for income and allocations with no obvious source and recipients. A monk should not be forced to account for those items for which the receipt is evident but its allocation is obscure. [F.99.a] A monk should not be forced to account for those items of which the allocation is evident but its receipt is obscure. A monk should mindfully and attentively monitor those items of which both the receipt and its allocation are evident.” [B9]

4.­158

After his encounter with the group of six, the shape-shifting nāga fled to the seashore, where he conjured up a second monastery with a high gate, skylights, and latticed windows. It too was adorned with balustrades, beguiling to the heart and beautiful to the eye, with a staircase to the upper level and perfectly outfitted with beds, seats, and supplies. Ocean nāgas, in the guise of brahmins and householders, gathered there and listened to the shape-shifting nāga teach the Dharma. After hearing the Dharma, they provided arriving monks and departing monks with all the supplies they needed.

4.­159

After passing the rainy season at the monastery, an old-timer left for Śrāvastī. As was their wont, the group of six thought, “Here, it is we who teach the Dharma to the brahmins and householders who come and assemble. It is we who trounce our adversaries and it is we who spread the fame of our order.”

4.­160

As the group of six did whatever their self-appointed duties called for, they would never leave the gate into Jetavana unattended. One day, Upananda rose early in the morning, cast aside his toothbrush, donned his orange mantle, and took up his post at the gate into Jetavana. When he saw, approaching off in the distance, an old-timer with a head as white as an āgati flower and drooping eyebrows, Upananda thought, “No doubt this is one of our elder monks.”

4.­161

Going out to greet him, he said, “Welcome, elder, welcome.”

“Homage to you, instructor.”

4.­162

Upananda thought, “My! I don’t recognize this old-timer as one of our instructors, nor do I recognize him as one of our preceptors.” [F.99.b]

4.­163

Upananda then said to him, “Old-timer, where have come from?”

“I’ve come from the seashore.”

4.­164

“Why? Is there a monastery there?”

“Yes, there is,” he replied.

4.­165

“What type is it?”

“Oh, it is but a poor one.”

4.­166

“What is the monastery like? How is it poor? If it is fully outfitted, it is a monastery, but if it lacks all the trappings, it is poor.”

“It is a monastery.”

4.­167

“What’s there?”

“A monk preacher lives there, where he teaches the Dharma to brahmins and householders. After hearing the Dharma, they provide arriving monks and departing monks with all the supplies they need.”

4.­168

As was their wont, when one among the group of six heard the slightest news they all gathered in the afternoon to discuss it. So Upananda went to the assembly hall and said to the group of six, “We venerables must put off our other business for a time.”

4.­169

“Have you heard some news?”

“Indeed I have,” Upananda replied. “There is a monastery on the seashore.”

4.­170

“What’s there?”

“A monk preacher lives there, where he teaches the Dharma to brahmins and householders. Upon hearing the Dharma from him, they provide arriving monks and departing monks with all the supplies they need. Come, let us pay a visit.”

4.­171

The debarred nāga, now disguised as a monk preacher, saw the six approaching from off in the distance, and thought, “Ah! Those rogues have arrived. What would they do if I refused to demurely acquiesce to them?”

4.­172

The ocean nāgas, in the guise of brahmins and householders, then gathered there and he taught them the Dharma. After hearing the Dharma, they provided the arriving monks and departing monks with all the supplies they needed, [F.100.a] at which point the group of six said, “Nanda and Upananda, what does this old-timer know?”

“The Ekottarikāgama.”

4.­173

“If these monks176 here are all versed in the Three Piṭakas, are teachers of Dharma in their own right, and possessed of intelligence and untrammeled confidence, why does he, who teaches the Dharma using this out-of-date Ekottarikāgama, not request teachings from them?”

4.­174

They said to the nāga, disguised as the monk preacher, “What do you know, old-timer?”

“The Ekottarikāgama.”

“You teach the Dharma using this out-of-date Ekottarikāgama while these monks here are all versed in the Three Piṭakas, are teachers of Dharma in their own right, and possessed of intelligence and untrammeled confidence. Why do you not request teachings from them?”

4.­175

“What? Nobles ones, do I stop them? Why do you not teach the Dharma?”

“Nanda and Upananda, this old-timer is at odds with us. We will act to evict him.”

Thinking, “If they move to evict me, I won’t find a place among the nāgas either,” then, while the group of six were sleeping, the nāga made the monastery vanish and slipped into the ocean.

4.­176

On waking on the sandy beach, the group of six said, “Nanda and Upananda, get up and erect a lion throne from which we shall teach the Dharma.”

When they noticed they had slept on a sandy beach, they said, “We opposed one who trusted in the Blessed One and served the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha, causing him to flee and make his monastery disappear.”

4.­177

When the monks asked the Blessed One, “Who was this being? A god, a nāga, a yakṣa?” the Blessed One replied, “That monk preacher was a shape shifter and yet this was so: [F.100.b] If the group of six monks had not opposed him, he would have served the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha for as long as the teachings remained.”

4.­178

The Blessed One thought, “All those shortcomings ensue from the monks’ teaching without being requested to do so.”

With that he said, “A monk should not teach without first having been asked to do so. If a monk teaches without first having been asked to do so, a breach occurs. If he is invited to do so, then no offense ensues.”

Saṅgharakṣita brings the Buddha’s teachings to the land of the nāgas

4.­179

Buddharakṣita, a wealthy householder with much riches and goods who lived in Śrāvastī, took a wife of equal caste and together they played with, took pleasure in, and amused one another.

Looking to guide them, the venerable Śāriputra went to their house and enjoined the householder and his wife to seek refuge and pledge to uphold the precepts. Some time afterwards, the householder’s wife conceived a child.

4.­180

Knowing this being was certain to become one of the fortunate, the venerable Śāriputra visited the family without any ascetic followers in his wake. Prostrating at his feet, the householder asked, “Does the noble one have no ascetic followers?”

“Householder,” he replied, “do you think my ascetic followers simply sprout up like weeds? It’s those who issue from people like you who become my ascetic followers.”

4.­181

“Noble one, my spouse has conceived a child. If she should give birth to a boy, I will offer him as an ascetic follower to the noble one.”

“Householder, I accept.”

4.­182

After eight or nine months had passed a boy was born, well proportioned, pleasing to the eye, [F.101.a] handsome, radiant, with a golden complexion, a head shaped well like a parasol, long arms, a broad forehead, eyebrows that meet, and a prominent nose.

Three weeks, or twenty-one days, after the birth, relatives came and gathered to celebrate his birth in grand style, during which time they discussed what name should be chosen for the boy. Some said, “Since the boy is Buddharakṣita’s son, the boy should be named Saṅgharakṣita,” and thus he was named Saṅgharakṣita.

4.­183

Fortified with milk, curd, butter, ghee, cream, and other nourishing foods, the boy Saṅgharakṣita grew quickly, shooting up like a lotus in a pond. On the very day Saṅgharakṣita was born, that same day sons were also born to five hundred merchants, each of whom was given a name appropriate to his patrilineage.

4.­184

In time the boy Saṅgharakṣita grew up and the venerable Śāriputra knew it was time to allow his going forth. So, looking to guide them, he went alone without any ascetic followers in his wake to the boy’s house. After prostrating at Śāriputra’s feet, the householder Buddharakṣita laid out a seat and invited the venerable Śāriputra to sit. As he sat, Śāriputra signaled to prompt the householder Buddharakṣita. The householder Buddharakṣita then said to Saṅgharakṣita, “Son, when you were in your mother’s womb, before you were even born, I offered you as an ascetic follower to the noble Śāriputra. Go and serve him.”

4.­185

As this was to be Saṅgharakṣita’s last life as a sentient being, a smile had already spread across his face and, without apprehension, neither crestfallen nor gloomy, he pledged to do as he was told. With that he became the venerable Śāriputra’s attendant apprentice and follower. [F.101.b] After the venerable Śāriputra had allowed his going forth and given him ordination, he taught Saṅgharakṣita how Dharma practitioners conduct themselves and made him recite the Four Āgamas.

4.­186

Some time later, after assembling merchandise to bring on their journey across the ocean, the five hundred sons of the five hundred merchants conferred and decided to bring, along with their goods, a noble monk across the ocean.

“Gentlemen, the ocean is full of many terrors. So those of us that journey across the ocean would do well to ask for the company of a noble one who might teach us the Dharma.”

4.­187

Beginning their search, they asked, “Who shall we ask to come?”

Some answered, “Gentlemen, we should ask our peer, the noble Saṅgharakṣita, for we grew up together playing in the dirt with him.”

4.­188

They went to him, prostrated at his feet, and said, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita, we grew up together playing in the dirt with you, our peer, so if we set out upon the ocean, an ocean full of many terrors, we would do well were the noble one to teach Dharma to those of us crossing the ocean. Therefore, noble one, we ask that you come with us across the ocean.”

“Gentlemen,” he replied, “as I am not at liberty to do as I please, you should put your request to my preceptor.”

4.­189

They went to the venerable Śāriputra, bowed their heads at his feet, and said, “Noble Śāriputra, please give us your attention. We grew up together playing in the dirt with our peer, the noble Saṅgharakṣita. So if we set out upon the ocean, [F.102.a] an ocean full of many terrors, we would do well were the noble one to teach Dharma to those of us crossing the ocean. For that reason, we ask that you send the noble Saṅgharakṣita with us across the ocean.”

“Ask the Blessed One himself and I will not object.”

4.­190

They went to the Blessed One, bowed their heads at his feet, and said, “Blessed One, please give us your attention. We grew up together playing in the dirt with our peer, the noble Saṅgharakṣita. So if we set out upon the ocean, an ocean full of many terrors, we would do well were the noble one to teach Dharma to those of us crossing the ocean. For that reason, we ask that you send the noble Saṅgharakṣita with us across the ocean.”

4.­191

The Blessed One considered whether or not these merchants had any meager roots of virtue and saw that they did. Considering who their awakening hinged on, he saw that it hinged on the monk Saṅgharakṣita. The Blessed One then said to the venerable Saṅgharakṣita, “Saṅgharakṣita, you shall go on this journey across the ocean and face your fears along with what provokes them.”

4.­192

With his silence, the venerable Saṅgharakṣita assented to the Blessed One. After performing rites for protection, good luck, and success, the five hundred merchants together with the venerable Saṅgharakṣita carried their goods to the ocean in carts, on poles, in baskets and hampers, and on camels, bullocks, [F.102.b] and donkeys. Setting out for the ocean, they passed in stages through villages, towns, countryside, kingdoms, and markets until they reached the ocean shore, where they paused to recover from the weariness of the road. For five hundred denarii they obtained a ship and hired five hundred crew members to serve as stewards, cleaning staff, divers, deck hands, and riggers. After calling out three times,177 they set out upon the ocean in pursuit of riches.

4.­193

Part of the way into their voyage, they and their seafaring ship were held up by nāgas. The merchants began to implore Śiva, Varuṇa, Kubera, Śakra, Brahmā, and other gods, “Whoever it is that dwells here, be they gods, nāgas, yakṣas, or gandharvas, may they tell us what they desire!”

From the ocean there came a voice, saying, “Give us the noble Saṅgharakṣita!”

“The noble Saṅgharakṣita is our peer. We grew up together playing in the dirt with him. The Blessed One and the venerable Śāriputra have entrusted him to us, so we would sooner die and face our death with him than turn him over.”

4.­194

The venerable Saṅgharakṣita said to them, “What are you talking about, gentlemen?”

“Noble one,” they replied, “a voice from the ocean has said, ‘Give us the noble Saṅgharakṣita!’ ”

“Why do you not give me over?”

4.­195

“Noble one, you are our peer. We grew up together playing in the dirt with you. The Blessed One and the venerable Śāriputra have entrusted you to us, so we would sooner die and face our death with you than turn you over.” [F.103.a]

The venerable Saṅgharakṣita thought, “This must be what the Blessed One meant when he said to me, ‘Saṅgharakṣita, you shall go on this journey across the ocean and face your fears along with what provokes them.’ ”

4.­196

Taking up his begging bowl and robe, he prepared to jump into the sea. Seeing him prepare to jump, the merchants shouted, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita! What are you doing? What are you doing?”

As they tried to stop him, Saṅgharakṣita jumped into the sea and at the very moment he did so, the nāgas released the ship. Taking the venerable Saṅgharakṣita, the nāgas returned to the land of the nāgas.

4.­197

Smiling at one another, the nāgas and their nāga women watched in amazement as they invited the venerable Saṅgharakṣita to pay homage to a set of shrines, saying, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita, this shall be the sanctuary of the perfectly awakened Buddha Vipaśyin, while these shall be the sanctuaries of the perfectly awakened Buddhas Śikhin, Viśvabhū, Krakucchanda, Kanakamuni, and Kāśyapa. This shall be the sanctuary of the Blessed One Śākyamuni.”178

4.­198

After prostrating to the shrines with them, Saṅgharakṣita sat on the seat they had arranged at the center of the assembled nāgas. The nāgas joined their palms and supplicated him: “Noble Saṅgharakṣita, though the Blessed One’s sūtras and mātṛkā have taken root among gods and humans, we nāgas were born into this cursed state with fallen forms! O noble one, please see that the ultimate sūtras take root among us!”

Saṅgharakṣita assented with the words, “I shall do just that.”

4.­199

The shape shifter who had fled his seaside monastery for the land of the nāgas after being confronted by the group of six then chose three nāga youths and said to the first, “You shall memorize [F.103.b] the Saṃyuktāgama.”

To the second he said, “You shall memorize the Madhyamāgama.”

To the third he said, “You shall memorize the Dīrghāgama. The nāgas can learn how to recite the Ekottarikāgama by listening to me recite it.”179

4.­200

When the young nāgas began to recite, the first closed his eyes as he sought to memorize the Saṃyuktāgama, the second turned his back as he sought to memorize the Madhyamāgama, while the third sat off in the distance as he sought to memorize the Dīrghāgama.

4.­201

Because the shape shifter had greater exposure to Buddhist customs than the others, he was respectful, deferential, and came first to all of their chores. He would rise early and say, “Noble ones, get up and brush your teeth. Pay homage to the gathering of blessed ones and their shrines. Eat and make the bed.”

4.­202

Once, as they were all reciting their respective Āgamas, the shape shifter said, “Noble one, if nāga youths recite the Āgamas, will they remember them or not?”

Saṅgharakṣita replied, “Even if with their good memories they remember them, they still have certain flaws.”

4.­203

“Noble one,” the shape shifter asked, “what are their failings?”

“They lack respect and deference. The first closes his eyes as he seeks to memorize the Saṃyuktāgama, the second turns his back as he seeks to memorize the Madhyamāgama, while the third sits off in the distance as he seeks to memorize the Dīrghāgama. You alone are respectful, deferential, and come first to all of your chores.”

4.­204

“Noble one,” the shape shifter replied, “it is not that they lack respect and deference. The one who closes his eyes as he seeks to memorize the Saṃyuktāgama has noxious eyes that burn; the one who turns his back as he seeks to memorize the Madhyamāgama has noxious breath; and the one who sits off in the distance as he seeks to memorize the Dīrghāgama [F.104.a] has a noxious touch. I myself have noxious fangs.”

4.­205

Frightened, the venerable Saṅgharakṣita thought, “Look! I am living among my mortal enemies,” and he grew pallid, emaciated, feeble, withered, thin, and weak.

The shape-shifting nāga asked, “Noble one, why have you become pallid, emaciated, feeble, withered, thin, and weak?”

“I am among enemies so the moment I do anything to upset you, I shall be reduced to naught but a memory.”

4.­206

“We do not intend to harm the noble one. However, given the situation, does the noble one wish to return to Jambudvīpa?”

“My dear sir, I do. I do not care for this place.”

The nāgas discussed the matter among themselves and when the noble Saṅgharakṣita’s ship passed by on its return journey, they raised him from the waters and placed him on board the ship.

4.­207

Smiles broke out upon the merchants’ faces as they stared in amazement and cried out, “Welcome back, noble Saṅgharakṣita, welcome back!”

Saṅgharakṣita said, “Gentlemen! Rejoice, for I have seen to it that the Four Āgamas have taken root in the land of nāgas!”

“Noble one, we do! We rejoice in this good you have done for others, for this is the job of those who go forth.”

4.­208

Reunited and happy, the merchants and the venerable Saṅgharakṣita completed the journey back to shore. On arriving, all were tired and weary. As his companions slept, the venerable Saṅgharakṣita turned his gaze to the ocean. [F.104.b]

4.­209

The Blessed One has said, “Monks, there are five things one never tires of looking at and which are in no way displeasing to the eye. What are the five? One never tires of looking at a clever and youthful elephant; a king of the world; the ocean with its monsters; Sumeru, the king of mountains; and a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened buddha‍—these five things are in no way displeasing to the eye.”

4.­210

Saṅgharakṣita gazed long at the ocean until just before dawn when, fatigued, he was overcome by a deep sleep. Not long after, the merchants loaded the pack animals and set out. But because it was in the wee hours of the morning, they could not see the venerable Saṅgharakṣita and they began to look and ask one another, “Gentlemen, what has happened to the noble Saṅgharakṣita?”

4.­211

Some suggested he had gone ahead while others said he was still coming from behind and still others said he was traveling in the middle of the caravan. After searching everywhere to no avail, they gave up. Dispirited and downcast, they said, “Gentlemen, it is not good that we have left the noble Saṅgharakṣita behind. We must turn around.”

4.­212

But then, on reflection, it occurred to them, “The noble Saṅgharakṣita possesses miraculous powers and great might. If he did not meet his end in the ocean, how could he meet his end while traveling on dry land? With his miraculous powers and great might, he must have gone far ahead of us and be waiting there now.”

4.­213

With the call, “Gentlemen, come, let us go!” they set out.

Saṅgharakṣita sees the effects of actions with his own eyes

4.­214

When the sun rose, its rays struck the venerable Saṅgharakṣita as he lay asleep on the empty, sandy beach, waking him from his slumber. Seeing no one around, he thought, “What will I do if the merchants have left? They might have gone in any direction!”

4.­215

With great courage, the venerable Saṅgharakṣita set out but he could see no trail. [F.105.a] After searching about, he spied a narrow path and set off upon it. After a time, he saw, in a forest of śāla trees, a monastery with a high gate, skylights, and latticed windows. It was adorned with balustrades, beguiling to the heart and beautiful to the eye, with a staircase to the upper level and perfectly outfitted with beds, seats, and supplies. It was surrounded by a variety of trees, and graced with pools and ponds, ringing with the sounds of swans, cranes, peacocks, parrots, mynahs, and cuckoos. When he saw the monks, finely dressed and well trained, living peacefully in this glorious and heavenly abode, he respectfully approached them.

4.­216

With a show of respect, they said to him, “Welcome, reverend Saṅgharakṣita, welcome. From where have you come just now?”

After he explained everything that had happened, they let him rest and once he recovered from the fatigue of the road, they led him into the monastery. [S.43.a] Once there, he saw that fine seats had been arranged and choice foods laid out. They asked him, “Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, are you not thirsty? Are you not hungry?”

4.­217

“Venerables,” he replied, “I am thirsty and I am hungry.”

“Then partake, reverend Saṅgharakṣita.”

“I will eat with the saṅgha.”

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, you are tired from your travels, so eat now. Later the food will have spoiled.”

4.­218

Seeing the drawback in waiting, Saṅgharakṣita ate and then took a seat off to one side. Some time later, the meal was laid out and when the gaṇḍī beam was struck, the monks filed in, each carrying his own begging bowl, and sat down in order of seniority. As soon as they sat down, the monastery vanished [F.105.b] and each of their begging bowls turned into iron clubs of different sorts. For the remainder of the meal, they bludgeoned each other over the head with their iron clubs, cracking their skulls open and inflicting unbearable pain that caused them to cry out pitifully.

4.­219

As soon as the mealtime ended, the monastery reappeared as before while the monks also resumed their peaceful demeanors. The venerable Saṅgharakṣita approached them and asked, “Who are you, venerables? What karma has led you to this?”

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita,” they replied, “the people of Jambudvīpa are skeptical, so you will not believe us.”

“Why would I not believe what I have seen with my own eyes?”

4.­220

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, we were disciples of the perfectly awakened Buddha Kāśyapa. While in the meal queue, we fought and, as the fruition of that karma, have been born as denizens of an ephemeral hell. As soon as we die and pass from this life, we will be reborn among the denizens of hell and will have to live there in such straits. Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, once you have returned to Jambudvīpa, say to your fellow brahmacārin, ‘Venerables, do not fight in the food queue like Kāśyapa’s monks. Do not act so as to accrue the fortune for that mass of suffering.’ It would be good if you were you to explain our plight at length.”

4.­221

After agreeing to do just that, Saṅgharakṣita departed. After some time, he saw again as before, in a forest of śāla trees, a second monastery with a high gate, skylights, and latticed windows. It was adorned with balustrades, beguiling to the heart and beautiful to the eye, with a staircase to the upper level, and perfectly outfitted [F.106.a] with beds, seats, and supplies. It was surrounded by a variety of trees, and graced with pools and ponds, ringing with the sounds of swans, cranes, peacocks, parrots, mynahs, and cuckoos. When he saw the monks, finely dressed and well trained, living peacefully in this glorious and heavenly abode, he respectfully approached them.

4.­222

With a show of respect, they said to him, “Welcome, reverend Saṅgharakṣita, welcome. From where have you come just now?”

After he explained everything that had happened, they let him rest and once he recovered from the fatigue of the road, they led him into the monastery. Once there, he saw that fine seats had been arranged and choice foods laid out. They asked him, “Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, are you not thirsty? Are you not hungry?”

4.­223

“Venerables, I am thirsty and I am hungry.”

“Then partake, reverend Saṅgharakṣita.”

“I will eat with the saṅgha.” [S.43.b]

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, you are fatigued from your travels, so eat now. Later the food will have spoiled.”

4.­224

Seeing the drawback in waiting, he ate and then took a seat off to one side. Some time later, the meal was laid out and when the gaṇḍī beam was struck, the monks filed in, each carrying his own begging bowl, and sat down in order of seniority. As soon as they sat down, the monastery vanished and the food and drink turned into molten iron. For the remainder of the meal, they doused one another in molten iron, scalding their bodies and inflicting unbearable pain that caused them to cry out pitifully.

4.­225

As soon as the mealtime ended, the monastery reappeared as before [F.106.b] while the monks also resumed their peaceful demeanors. The venerable Saṅgharakṣita approached them and asked, “Who are you, venerables? What karma has led you to this?”

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita,” they replied, “the people of Jambudvīpa are skeptical, so you will not believe us.”

“Why would I not believe what I have seen with my own eyes?”

4.­226

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, we were disciples of the perfectly awakened Buddha Kāśyapa. Once the saṅgha had received a supply of rich food and when a group of arriving monks turned up, those of us overcome by greed thought and even said, ‘We should not serve the food until the arriving monks have left.’ For seven days, an unseasonable rain fell, spoiling the food and drink, leaving it unsuitable for consumption. Thus we wasted what had been given in faith and, as the fruition of that karma, have been born as denizens of an ephemeral hell. As soon as we die and pass from this life, we will be reborn among the denizens of a great hell and will have to live there in such straits. Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, once you have returned to Jambudvīpa, say to your fellow brahmacārin, ‘Venerables, do not waste what has been given in faith like Kāśyapa’s monks. Do not act so as to accrue the fortune for that mass of suffering.’ It would be well were you to explain our plight at length.”

4.­227

After agreeing to do just that, Saṅgharakṣita departed. After some time, he saw again as before, in a forest of śāla trees, a third monastery with a high gate, skylights, and latticed windows. It was adorned with balustrades, beguiling to the heart and beautiful to the eye, [F.107.a] with a staircase to the upper level and perfectly outfitted with beds, seats, and supplies. It was surrounded by a variety of trees, and graced with pools and ponds, ringing with the sounds of swans, cranes, peacocks, parrots, mynahs, and cuckoos. When he saw the monks, finely dressed and well trained, living peacefully in this glorious and heavenly abode, he respectfully approached them.

4.­228

With a show of respect, they said to him, “Welcome, reverend Saṅgharakṣita, welcome. From where have you just now come?”

After he explained everything that had happened, they let him rest and once he recovered from the fatigue of the road, they led him into the monastery. Once there, he saw that fine seats had been arranged and choice foods laid out. They asked him, “Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, are you not thirsty? Are you not hungry?”

4.­229

“Venerables, I am thirsty and I am hungry.”

“Then partake, reverend Saṅgharakṣita.”

“I will eat with the saṅgha.”

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, you are fatigued from your travels, so eat now. Later the food will have spoiled.”

4.­230

Seeing the drawback in waiting, he ate and then took a seat off to one side. Some time later, the meal was laid out and when the gaṇḍī beam was struck, the monks filed in, each carrying his own begging bowl, and sat down in order of seniority. As soon as they sat down, the monastery caught alight, burst into flames, and was engulfed in a fire that began to burn as a single, giant inferno. [S.44.a] For the remainder of the meal, the fire raged, burning their bodies and inflicting unbearable pain that caused them to cry out pitifully.

4.­231

As soon as the mealtime ended, the monastery reappeared as before while the monks [F.107.b] also resumed their peaceful demeanors. The venerable Saṅgharakṣita approached them and asked, “Who are you, venerables? What karma has led you to this?”

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita,” they replied, “the people of Jambudvīpa are skeptical, so you will not believe us.”

“Why would I not believe what I have seen with my own eyes?”

4.­232

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, we were disciples of the perfectly awakened Buddha Kāśyapa. In time, our ethics became lax and we became dissolute. When the ethical monks evicted us from the monastery, we took up in an empty monastery. After a while, an ethical monk happened by, which gave us an idea. We thought, ‘He alone can purify patronage.180 We must get him to stay,’ and so he stayed. And in time, as a result of that, many ethical monks gathered there, who then proceeded to evict us. Those of us who could not bear this piled wood, straw, and dried dung and set fire to the monastery, burning many of the monks intent on training there. As the fruition of that karma, we have been born as denizens of an ephemeral hell. As soon as we die and pass from this life, we will be reborn among the denizens of hell and will have to live there in such straits. Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, once you have returned to Jambudvīpa, say to your fellow brahmacārin, ‘Venerables, do not nurse hatred for your fellow brahmacārin as Kāśyapa’s monks did. Do not act so as to accrue the fortune for that mass of suffering.’ It would be well were you to explain our plight at length.” [F.108.a]

4.­233

After agreeing to do just that, Saṅgharakṣita departed. On his journey, the venerable Saṅgharakṣita saw beings shaped like walls, pillars, trees, leaves, flowers, fruit, rope, brooms, bowls, mortars and pestles, pots, and even beings cut at the waist, their bodies held together by tendons.181

Saṅgharakṣita’s sermon leads five hundred seers to the truth

4.­234

Eventually, the venerable Saṅgharakṣita reached a settlement with an ashram where there lived five hundred seers. The seers saw the venerable Saṅgharakṣita approaching from off in the distance and began to confer with one another: “Listen, gentlemen. These ascetic sons of the Śākya tend to preach a great deal. Let none of us offer a single word in response.”

4.­235

Having made this pact, they remained where they were. With a peaceful demeanor, Saṅgharakṣita approached them, but when he requested a place to stay, they gave not a word in response. A single seer, intent on merit, said, “Why do we not give you a place to stay? It is because you have a fault. You tend to preach a lot. You must therefore swear an oath: I will give you a place if you refrain from giving even the slightest sermon.”

4.­236

“Seer, as you instruct, I shall not preach,” replied Saṅgharakṣita.

The seer took Saṅgharakṣita to an unoccupied thatched hut in the settlement and told him he could sleep there. Saṅgharakṣita sprinkled water on, swept, and applied fresh cow dung to the dirt floor of the thatched hut.182 On seeing this, the seers said, “Gentlemen, these ascetic sons of the Śākya are sanitary.” [S.44.b]

4.­237

Saṅgharakṣita washed his feet outside the thatched hut before going back inside. Sitting down, he crossed his legs, held his body erect, [F.108.b] and rested in mindfulness. A goddess living in the ashram went to the venerable Saṅgharakṣita during the evening watch and said, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita, please teach the Dharma.”

4.­238

“Goddess, I wish you well but did you not see I received this resting place by making a pact? Would you like me to be kicked out?”

The goddess thought, “This renunciant is tired, so I shall return during the night watch.” She returned during the night watch and said, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita, please teach the Dharma.”

“Sister, you just can’t leave it be! You must want me to be kicked out!”

4.­239

She thought, “This renunciant is still groggy from sleep. I shall return during the final watch.” She returned during the final watch and said, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita, why do you sleep? I woke you in the middle of the night and asked you to teach the Dharma.”

“Sister, you are trying by every means to get me kicked out!”

4.­240

“Noble one, the darkness of night has passed. Even if you were kicked out, why would it matter? You’d be seeking to leave soon anyway. Did the Blessed One not say you must face your fears along with what provokes them?”

“Sister, what you say is true. I must get going regardless of whether I am kicked out. Since these people are brahmins, I should recite a verse the brahmins themselves take to be true.”

Saṅgharakṣita then began to recite the Brāhmaṇavarga:183

4.­241
So long as doubt remains, going naked
With matted hair, smeared in mud; a motley diet;
Sleeping rough, unwashed and smelly;
And the practice of squatting, do not make men pure.184
But he who forsakes violence toward all who live;
Acts with virtue; is pacific, subdued, and restrained;
And aspires to purity, even if he be bedecked in jewelry,
That is a brahmin, an ascetic, a monk. [F.109.a]
4.­242

On hearing this verse, the seers thought, “This monk’s verses express the real meaning of ‘brahmin.’ ” One seer drew near, then a second and a third, until they all surrounded him, at which point the goddess charmed them so they could not see one another. After that Saṅgharakṣita began to recite the Nagaropama Sūtra:185


4.­243

Thus did I hear at one time. The Blessed One was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī. The Blessed One said to the monks, “Monks, before I achieved perfect awakening and became a perfect buddha, I went alone into the wild. While inwardly absorbed, this perfect thought arose in my mind: ‘Ah! This world is prone to suffering, for we are born, we age, we die, we deteriorate, and then it all happens again. And though a higher state exists, beings who age and die know nothing of the perfect remedies that exist.’

4.­244

“I then pondered what was needed for birth to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of birth. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is becoming, there will be birth, and becoming contributes to the occurrence of birth.

4.­245

“I then pondered what was needed for becoming to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of becoming. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: [S.45.a] if there is grasping, there will be becoming, and grasping contributes to the occurrence of becoming. [F.109.b]

4.­246

“I then pondered what was needed for grasping to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of grasping. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is craving, there will be grasping, and craving contributes to the occurrence of grasping.

4.­247

“I then pondered what was needed for craving to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of craving. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is sensation, there will be craving, and sensation contributes to the occurrence of craving.

4.­248

“I then pondered what was needed for sensation to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of sensation. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is contact, there will be sensation, and contact contributes to the occurrence of sensation.

4.­249

“I then pondered what was needed for contact to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of contact. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there are seats for the six senses, there will be contact, and seats for the six senses contribute to the occurrence of contact.

4.­250

“I then pondered what was needed for the seats of the six senses to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of the seats of the six senses. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there are name and form, there will be seats for the six senses, and name and form contribute to the occurrence of seats for the six senses.

4.­251

“I then pondered what was needed for name and form to occur and what conditions contribute to the occurrence of name and form. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is consciousness, there will be name and form, and consciousness contributes to the occurrence of name and form.

4.­252

“I then pondered what was needed for consciousness to occur and [F.110.a] what conditions contribute to the occurrence of consciousness. By reversing the conception of ‘I,’ one will not incite what follows from that.

4.­253

“Thus consciousness contributes to name and form, name and form contribute to the seats of the six senses, the seats of the six senses contribute to contact, contact contributes to sensation, sensation contributes to craving, craving contributes to grasping, grasping contributes to becoming, becoming contributes to birth, birth contributes to aging and death, and the occurrence of sorrow, lamentation, suffering, unhappiness, and strife. And that is how, I thought, this whole huge mass of suffering comes to be.

4.­254

“I then pondered what must be absent for aging and death not to occur and what must cease for aging and death to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no birth, no aging and death will occur, and the cessation of birth arrests aging and death.

4.­255

“I then pondered what must be absent for birth not to occur and what must cease for birth to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no becoming, no birth will occur, and the cessation of becoming arrests birth.

4.­256

“I then pondered what must be absent for becoming not to occur and what must cease for becoming to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no grasping, [S.45.b] no becoming will occur, and the cessation of grasping arrests becoming.

4.­257

“I then pondered what must be absent for grasping not to occur and what must cease for grasping to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no craving, no grasping will occur, and the cessation of craving arrests grasping.

4.­258

“I then pondered what must be absent for craving not [F.110.b] to occur and what must cease for craving to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no sensation, no craving will occur, and the cessation of sensation arrests craving.

4.­259

“I then pondered what must be absent for sensation not to occur and what must cease for sensation to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no contact, no sensation will occur, and the cessation of contact arrests sensation.

4.­260

“I then pondered what must be absent for contact not to occur and what must cease for contact to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there are no seats for the six senses, no contact will occur, and the cessation of the seats for the six senses arrests contact.

4.­261

“I then pondered what must be absent for the seats of the six senses not to occur and what must cease for the seats of the six senses to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there are no name and form, no seats of the six senses will occur, and the cessation of name and form arrests the seats of the six senses.

4.­262

“I then pondered what must be absent for name and form not to occur and what must cease for name and form to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no consciousness, no name and form will occur, and the cessation of consciousness arrests name and form.

4.­263

“I then pondered what must be absent for consciousness not to occur and what must cease for consciousness to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no conditioning, no consciousness will occur, and the cessation of conditioning arrests consciousness.

4.­264

“I then pondered what must be absent for conditioning [F.111.a] not to occur and what must cease for conditioning to cease. On proper reflection, I realized this perfectly and as it is: if there is no ignorance, no conditioning will occur, and the cessation of ignorance arrests conditioning.

4.­265

“Thus the cessation of ignorance arrests conditioning, the cessation of conditioning arrests consciousness, the cessation of consciousness arrests name and form, the cessation of name and form arrests the seats of the six senses, the cessation of the seats of the six senses arrests contact, the cessation of contact arrests sensation, the cessation of sensation arrests craving, the cessation of craving arrests grasping, the cessation of grasping arrests becoming, the cessation of becoming arrests birth, the cessation of birth arrests aging and death, and sorrow, lamentation, suffering, unhappiness, and strife. And that is how, I thought, this whole huge mass of suffering comes to cease. [B10]

4.­266

“Monks, I thought of this as an old path I had found, an old [S.46.a] route, an old trail which seers of old have traveled and traversed. It is analogous to this: Say that a person wanders, passing through a great forest, and discovers an old path, an old route, an old trail which people of old have traveled and traversed and he follows it until he sees an old city and a king’s delightful old palace, with its resplendent gardens, resplendent parks, resplendent pools, and fine hedges. On seeing it, he thinks, “I shall go and speak to the king!” He goes to the king and says, “Your majesty, please grant me your attention. I was wandering, passing through a great forest, [F.111.b] when I discovered an old path, an old route, an old trail which people of old have traveled and traversed and I followed it until I saw an old city and the king’s delightful old palace, with its resplendent gardens, resplendent parks, resplendent pools, and fine hedges. Your Majesty, allow me to restore the city, allow me to restore the king’s palace.” In time, the king’s palace prospers and thrives, crops are bountiful and the land teems with animals and people.

4.­267

“Just so, monks, I too have found an old path, an old route, an old trail which seers of old have traveled and traversed. Monks, what is this old path, this old route, this old trail which seers of old have traveled and traversed? It is this, the Noble Ones’ Eightfold Path, which consists of right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right recollection, and right concentration.

4.­268

“Monks, this is the old path, the old route, the old trail which seers of old have traveled and traversed. I reached it and on reaching it, I saw aging and death, and I saw the origins of aging and death, the cessation of aging and death, and the path that leads to the cessation of aging and death. I saw birth, becoming, grasping, craving, sensation, contact, the seats of the six senses, name and form, consciousness, and conditioning. And I saw the origins of conditioning, the cessation of conditioning, and the path that leads to the cessation of conditioning. And so, having been perfectly awakened by my perception, [F.112.a] I proclaim it to an array of monks, nuns, laymen, laywomen, tīrthikas, ascetics, brahmins, sādhus,186 and wandering mendicants.

4.­269

“And when a monk perfectly accomplishes it, he too becomes an accomplished adept, sagacious, righteous, and an agent of virtue. And when a nun, a layman, or a laywoman perfectly accomplishes it, they too become accomplished adepts, sagacious, righteous, and agents of virtue.

4.­270

“Thus it is that such a one who lives purely is magnanimous, of benefit to a great many beings, prodigious,187 and teaches widely and perfectly among gods and humans.”


Saṅgharakṣita closed his sermon with the dedication:

4.­271
“May all who live here gathered
On the earth or in the sky
Be always kind to creatures,
And practice Dharma night and day.”
4.­272

All present realized the truths and in that moment achieved the fruit of a non-returner and with it, miraculous abilities. In one voice they cried out, “Well said, reverend Saṅgharakṣita, well said!”

4.­273

The goddess then released them from the miraculous spell they were under so they came to see one another again. As they caught sight of one another, they exclaimed, “Oh! You too were here?”

4.­274

“You were here?” [S.46.b]

“I was here.”

“Good!”

4.­275

The seers had discovered a mighty state and having discovered it, proclaimed, “Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, if it is permitted, we would receive the going forth, ordination, and monkhood in the well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya. We would live the holy life in the Blessed One’s presence.”

4.­276

Smiling, Saṅgharakṣita said, “Venerables, your great and dauntless self-confidence [F.112.b] is noble. It is excellent! It is excellent! What is more, the Blessed One said, ‘Five advantages rightly come only to the wise with perfect vision who aspire to going forth.’ What are those five? (1) It is only the wise with perfect vision who aspire to going forth about whom it may rightly be said, ‘He will pursue his aim without diversion.’ (2) It is only the wise with perfect vision who aspire to going forth about whom it may rightly be said, ‘I make offerings to and praise those who are slave, agent, or emissary to no one, those who are independent and not in anyone’s service.’ (3) It is only the wise with perfect vision who aspire to going forth about whom it may rightly be said, ‘He will attain the unsurpassed accomplishment and bliss of nirvāṇa.’ (4) It is only the wise with perfect vision who aspire to going forth about whom it may rightly be said, ‘Even should he fail to attain the unsurpassed accomplishment and bliss of nirvāṇa, he will be reborn among gods.’ (5) It is only the wise with perfect vision who aspire to going forth about whom it may rightly be said, ‘Buddhas, the saintly disciples of buddhas who have reached perfection and entered perfection, and saintly beings praise renunciants in many ways.’ ”

4.­277

Saṅgharakṣita continued, “So, you shall go forth. But will you go forth before the Blessed One or before me?”

“Before the Blessed One,” the seers replied.

“In that case, come, let us go to the Blessed One.”

4.­278

“Reverend Saṅgharakṣita, shall we travel under our own miraculous powers or under your miraculous powers?”

4.­279

Hearing this pained the venerable Saṅgharakṣita, [F.113.a] who thought, “If they have attained such a store of qualities due to my influence, it looks as if I am but a raft to them.”

Dispirited, he replied, “Venerables, I have a small task to perform, so please wait here for a bit.” And with that, he sat down at the base of a tree, his legs crossed, his body erect, and rested in mindfulness.

4.­280

The Blessed One said, “There are five benefits to being well versed in the teachings. What are they? One becomes knowledgeable about the aggregates, knowledgeable about the constituents, knowledgeable about the seats of the senses, knowledgeable about interdependent arising, and one need not rely on others for instructions or further teachings on them.”

4.­281

Thus, by applying himself diligently, Saṅgharakṣita came to understand saṃsāra’s ever-revolving five cycles.188 It being by nature subject to degradation, decline, dispersal, and destruction, all of Saṅgharakṣita’s conditioning was overwhelmed and he abandoned all disturbing emotions. He perceived that he had, in that very life, actualized the unsurpassed aim of the holy life for which the sons of noble families, with perfect faith, cut their hair, shave their beards, don the saffron robes, and go forth from home into homelessness. With his achievement, he understood, “My births have come to an end, I have lived the holy life, I have done what needed doing, I will know no lives after this one.”

4.­282

Thus he became an arhat, free of desire for the three realms, for whom filth was equal to gold, for whom space was equal to the palm of his hand, whose emotions had been cooled as if treated by a balm of sandalwood, and whose knowledge had rent open the shell. He attained knowledge, clairvoyance, and discerning wisdom. He turned his back on worldly gain, desires, and esteem, and was venerated, honored, and saluted by Indra and the gods who attend him. [F.113.b]

4.­283

Saṅgharakṣita said to the seers, “Gentlemen, hold on to the corner of my robe and we shall travel under my miraculous powers.”

The seers grabbed hold of his robe, and the venerable Saṅgharakṣita, like a swan spreading its wings, flew with his miraculous powers up into the sky above.

Saṅgharakṣita leads an entourage of one thousand to the Buddha

4.­284

Along the way, the five hundred merchants were securing their wares when they saw Saṅgharakṣita and exclaimed, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita! Is that you? Welcome!”

“I have come.”

4.­285

“Where are you headed?”

“These five hundred sons of noble families want monkhood, to go forth and be ordained in the well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya, so we are going to the Blessed One.”

The merchants replied, “Noble Saṅgharakṣita, we too will go forth, so please alight and sit while we secure our wares.”

4.­286

Saṅgharakṣita descended and they secured their wares. Saṅgharakṣita then led the one thousand sons of noble families to the Blessed One, who was seated in the midst of hundreds of monks, teaching. From off in the distance, the Blessed One saw Saṅgharakṣita approaching with his gifts. Though he saw them, he asked the monks, “Monks, do you see Saṅgharakṣita coming from off in the distance?”

“We do, reverend.”

“Monks, this monk Saṅgharakṣita comes with gifts for the Tathāgata. There is no gift for the Tathāgata like these, the gift of disciples.”

4.­287

Saṅgharakṣita went to the Blessed One, bowed his head at his feet, and sat off to one side before [F.114.a] [S.47.a] requesting the Blessed One, “Reverend, these one thousand sons of noble families want monkhood, to go forth and be ordained in the well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya. May the Blessed One, out of compassion, allow their goings forth and allow their ordination.”

4.­288

The Blessed One allowed goings forth by saying the phrase, “Come, monk,” and so as soon as he said, “Come, monks. Live the holy life,” their hair fell out and they were clad in robes; with but a week’s growth of hair and beard, begging bowls and water jars in hand, settled, with the composure of monks who had been ordained for one hundred years. As was said,

4.­289
Hair tonsured and body clad in robes
By the Tathāgata’s call to come forth,
That moment, their senses were perfectly stilled
And their bodies garbed by the Buddha’s mind.
4.­290

The Blessed One gave them instructions, to which they applied themselves with diligence, effort, and exertion, abandoning all disturbing emotions and actualizing arhatship. Thus they became arhats, free of desire for the three realms, for whom filth was equal to gold, for whom space was equal to the palm of his hand, whose emotions had been cooled as if treated by a balm of sandalwood, and whose knowledge had rent open the shell. They attained knowledge, clairvoyance, and discerning wisdom. They turned their backs on worldly gain, desires, and esteem, and were venerated, honored, and saluted by Indra and the gods who attend him.

The Blessed One explains the causes for the sights Saṅgharakṣita has seen

4.­291

The venerable Saṅgharakṣita asked the Blessed Buddha, “Reverend, I have seen beings shaped like walls, pillars, trees, [F.114.b] leaves, flowers, fruit, rope, brooms, bowls, mortars and pestles, and pots, as well as beings cut at the waist, their bodies held together by tendons. Reverend, what actions did they perform for it to ripen in such ways?”

4.­292

“Saṅgharakṣita,” replied the Blessed One, “those being themselves performed the actions‍—which have accrued a heap of karma, whose results have matured, which follow their course like an irrigation channel, which inevitably come to be‍—so who else will experience the actions they themselves have performed and accrued?

4.­293

“Saṅgharakṣita, actions which have been performed and accrued do not ripen upon the external elements. They do not ripen upon the element of water, upon the element of fire, nor upon the element of wind. Likewise, virtuous and non-virtuous actions which have been performed and accrued come to fruition upon the aggregates, elements, and seats of the senses of the one who performed them, for:

4.­294
“Actions never waste away,
Not even after one hundred eons. [S.47.b]
When the time and the conditions
Are right, they alight upon embodied beings.
4.­295

“Saṅgharakṣita, in a time now passed, during this fortunate eon, when the lifespan of beings was twenty thousand years, the Blessed Buddha Kāśyapa appeared in the world, a teacher, a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened buddha, a knowledgeable and venerable one, a sugata, one who knew the world, an unsurpassed guide who tamed beings, a teacher to gods and men. Those beings you saw were his disciples when he lived and dwelt in the Ṛṣipatana Deer Park near Vārāṇasī.

4.­296

“Saṅgharakṣita, when those beings you saw who were shaped like walls were monks, they defaced a wall belonging to the saṅgha with their spit. [F.115.a] As the fruition of that act, they have come to resemble walls.

“When those beings you saw who were shaped like pillars were monks, they defaced a pillar belonging to the saṅgha with their mucus. As the fruition of that act, they have come to resemble pillars.

4.­297

“When those beings you saw who were shaped like trees, leaves, flowers, and fruit were monks, they used trees, leaves, flowers, and fruit belonging to the saṅgha for their own ends. As the fruition of that act, they have come to resemble trees, leaves, flowers, and fruit.

“When those beings you saw who were shaped like rope and brooms were monks, they used rope and brooms belonging to the saṅgha for their own ends. As the fruition of that act, they have come to resemble rope and brooms.

4.­298

“When those beings you saw who were shaped like bowls were monks, they were in charge of providing clean drinking water. When they were washing the bowls, some arriving monks arrived and asked the monks, ‘Do novices get whatever drinks are provided to the saṅgha?’

“Seized by stinginess towards the novices, they replied, ‘Do you not see we are washing the bowls? The drinks have already been drunk.’

“The novices thought, ‘It would seem we are too late,’ and left dispirited, with expressions of resignation. As the fruition of that act, those monks have come to resemble bowls.

4.­299

“When those beings you saw who were shaped like mortars and pestles were monks, they were in charge of begging bowls and they said to an arhat novice who had at the time been appointed keeper of the seals,189 ‘Novice, we have quite a bit of grain to grind in the mortar, [F.115.b] so give it here.’

“The arhat novice replied, ‘Elders, I’m busy at the moment. Please wait a bit. I shall give it to you later.’

4.­300

“Feeling impatient, the monks became enraged and said, ‘Novice, if we wanted to use the mortar, we could toss you into the mortar and grind you too! To say nothing of a bit of grain!’

“The arhat novice thought, ‘They are enraged. If I respond to them, it will only inflame their anger further,’ so he remained silent.

4.­301

“After a time their rage passed, and when it did he went to them and said, ‘Elders, do you know who I am?’

“They replied, ‘Yes, we know. You are but a novice who has gone forth for the perfectly awakened Buddha Kāśyapa. We, however, are monks.’

4.­302

“ ‘Elders, though that is so, since going forth, I have done all that needed to be done. What is that? I have abandoned all disturbing emotions and actualized arhatship. While you are bound by all bonds, I have been definitively freed from all bonds. As you have spoken harshly, you must confess your wrongs as wrong! Doing so will wither away the act, exhaust it, and finally put it to rest.’

“Although the monks confessed their wrongs as wrong, the actions came to fruition, causing them to resemble mortars and pestles.

4.­303

“Those beings you saw who were shaped like pots were formerly bondmen in the service of the saṅgha. Once as they were boiling medicinal herbs, [S.48.a] the monks spoke offensively to them, whereupon they broke the pots in anger. As the fruition of that act, they have come to resemble pots.

4.­304

“And when the beings [F.116.a] you saw who were cut at the waist, their bodies held together by tendons, were monks in charge of supplies, they were overcome by stinginess and switched supplies, swapping the summer supplies with those for the winter and switching the winter supplies with those for the summer. As the fruition of that act, they have become beings cut at the waist, their bodies held together by tendons.”

The Blessed One explains the reasons for Saṅgharakṣita’s good fortune

4.­305

In doubt, the monks asked he who severs all doubts, the Blessed Buddha, “Reverend, what is it that Saṅgharakṣita has done, that the ripened fruit of that action has led him to be born into a rich household with ample wealth and possessions, to actualize arhatship, and to inspire the conversion of so many?”

4.­306

“Monks,” replied The Blessed One, “Saṅgharakṣita himself performed the actions‍—which have accrued a heap of karma, whose results have matured, which follow their course like an irrigation channel, which inevitably come to be‍—so who else will experience the actions he himself has performed and accrued? Monks, actions which have been performed and accrued do not ripen upon the external elements. They do not ripen upon the element of water, upon the element of fire, nor upon the element of wind. Likewise, virtuous and non-virtuous actions which have been performed and accrued come to fruition upon the aggregates, elements, and seats of the senses of the one who performed them, for:

4.­307
“Actions never waste away,
Not even after one hundred eons.
When the time and the conditions
Are right, they alight upon embodied beings.

“Monks, in a time now passed, during this fortunate eon, when the lifespan of beings was twenty thousand years, the Blessed Buddha Kāśyapa appeared in the world, a teacher, a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened buddha, a knowledgeable and venerable one, a sugata, one who knew the world, an unsurpassed guide who tamed beings, a teacher to gods and men. [F.116.b] While the Blessed Buddha Kāśyapa lived and dwelt in the Ṛṣipatana Deer Park near Vārāṇasī, Saṅgharakṣita went forth into his teachings and served as a custodian, living together with five hundred others.

4.­308

“Most of the community of people who lived in that hilly fastness came to have great faith in him. Though he lived purely his entire life he never attained any of the store of qualities. Then one day he fell ill and though he was ministered to with medicinal roots, stalks, leaves, flowers, and fruits, the illness would not subside. In despair, as he was dying, he made this prayer: ‘Though I have spent my entire life living the holy life under Kāśyapa, the blessed tathāgata, perfectly awakened Buddha, and unsurpassed object of veneration, I have not attained any of the store of qualities. May these roots of virtue from having spent my entire life living the holy life ensure that I go forth into the teachings of Buddha Śākyamuni, regarding whom the blessed tathāgata and perfectly awakened Buddha Kāśyapa prophesied to the young brahmin Uttara, saying, ‘Young brahmin, in the future, when the lifespan of beings is one hundred years, you will become the tathāgata, the arhat, the perfectly awakened Buddha, the knowledgeable and venerable one, the sugata, the one who knows the world, the unsurpassed guide who tames beings, the teacher to gods and men known as the Blessed Buddha Śākyamuni, and go on to abandon all disturbing emotions and actualize arhatship.’

4.­309

“The monk caretaker’s wards then approached him and asked, ‘Preceptor, have you attained any of the store of qualities?’

“ ‘No, I have not,’ he replied. [S.48.b]

“They asked, ‘What prayers have you made?’

“He replied by explaining the prayer he had made.

“They said, [F.117.a] ‘May we too, by taking you, our preceptor, as our spiritual guide, go forth into the teachings of that very Blessed One and go on to abandon all disturbing emotions and actualize arhatship.’

4.­310

“Monks, the monk who served as monk caretaker in that life was none other than the monk Saṅgharakṣita. His five hundred wards are none other than these five hundred seers. The community of people who lived in that hilly fastness are none other than the five hundred merchants. Hence, now the ripened fruit of the venerable custodian’s action has led him to be born into a rich household with ample wealth and possessions. The prayers he made as he lay dying have led to his abandoning all disturbing emotions, actualizing arhatship, and inspiring such a massive conversion.

4.­311

“The ripened fruits of wholly negative actions are wholly negative, while the ripened fruits of wholly positive actions are wholly positive, and the ripened fruits of mixed actions are mixed. Monks, therefore abandon wholly negative and mixed actions and seek wholly positive actions. Monks, this is how you should train.”

The Blessed One explains the reasons for the shape-shifting nāga’s faith

4.­312

In doubt, the monks asked he who had severed all doubts, the Blessed Buddha, [F.117.b] “Reverend, how did the youthful, shape-shifting nāga first gain faith?”

4.­313

The Blessed One replied, “Monks, during this fortunate eon, when the lifespan of beings was twenty thousand years, the Blessed Buddha Kāśyapa appeared in the world, a teacher, a tathāgata, an arhat, a perfectly awakened buddha, a knowledgeable and venerable one, a sugata, one who knew the world, an unsurpassed guide who tamed beings, a teacher to gods and men. He lived and dwelt with a following of twenty thousand monks in the Ṛṣipatana Deer Park near Vārāṇasī. He taught the Dharma to his disciples, saying, ‘Monks, make your beds in forests and at the foot of trees; in uninhabited places, mountain basins, mountain caves, and huts of straw; in the open, in charnel grounds, in jungles, at the foot of mountains, and at the edges of forests, and there practice meditation. Monks, apply yourselves conscientiously and be sure you will have no regrets later. These are my instructions and my guidance.’

4.­314

“After the Blessed One said this to the monks, the monks went to make their bed in forests and at the foot of trees; in uninhabited places, mountain basins, mountain caves, and huts of straw; in the open, in charnel grounds, in jungles, at the foot of mountains, and at the edges of forests. Some practiced meditation on the slopes of Sumeru. Some practiced meditation on the seven golden mountains, some at Lake Anavatapta, some along gently lapping ponds, and some in villages, towns, regions, countryside, and kingdoms inhabited by like-minded yogis.

4.­315

“Meanwhile, a young nāga born not long before that [F.118.a] was carried off to the top shelf of Mount Sumeru by the garūḍa Suparṇi. In time, the young nāga saw monks of pacific bearing diligently practicing meditation, recitation, and yoga. Seeing them caused great faith to well up in his mind. With his mind filled with faith, it occurred to him, ‘These great and noble souls have been freed from sufferings such as mine.’ The young nāga placed great faith in them, and eventually his time came, after which he was born into a brahmin family dedicated to the six duties,190 and in time he grew up under their nurture and care.

4.­316

“He later went forth into the perfectly awakened and blessed Buddha Kāśyapa’s teachings and, through diligence, effort, and exertion, abandoned all disturbing emotions and actualized arhatship. Thus he became an arhat, free of desire for the three realms, [S.49.a] for whom filth was equal to gold, for whom space was equal to the palm of his hand, whose emotions had been cooled as if treated by a balm of sandalwood, and whose knowledge had rent open the shell. He attained knowledge, clairvoyance, and discerning wisdom. He turned his back on worldly gain, desires, and esteem, and was venerated, honored, and saluted by Indra and the gods who attend him.

4.­317

“On wondering, ‘Whence have I come? Where have I been born? What actions led to this?’ he saw that he had been a creature who had died and passed on, had been born among humans, and that he had given rise to great faith in great disciples.

4.­318

“He then thought of his mother and father from his previous life as a young nāga. On wondering, ‘Where are my parents?’ he saw that they were among the nāgas. On wondering, ‘What are they doing?’ he saw that they were crying, still living among the nāgas. Using his miraculous powers, he went there and asked, ‘Father, Mother, why are you sad?’ [F.118.b]

“They replied, ‘Noble one, our young nāga was snatched shortly after his birth by the garūḍa Suparṇi. We do not know where to look for him.’

4.­319

“He replied, ‘Father, Mother, I am he. After my time came and I died, I was born into a brahmin family dedicated to the six duties. I then went forth into the perfectly awakened and blessed Buddha Kāśyapa’s teachings and, through diligence, effort, and exertion, abandoned all disturbing emotions and actualized arhatship.’

4.­320

“ ‘Noble one, given the wretched form you had, we never imagined you in the higher realms, to say nothing of arhatship! This is indeed amazing and marvelous! Did you find or attain such a store of qualities? Noble one, you are an accepter of alms but we are seekers of merit,191 so every day you must come to this very place and take your meal before returning.’

4.­321

“After agreeing to that, every day he partook of ambrosia in the land of the nāgas before returning. Some monks asked his novice ward, ‘Novice, where does your preceptor eat and return from?’

“The novice ward replied, ‘I have not inquired.’

4.­322

“ ‘If your preceptor partakes of ambrosia in the land of the nāgas before returning here, why do you not go with him?’

“ ‘How could I accompany him when he uses his miraculous powers and great might to travel there?’

“ ‘When he travels with his miraculous powers, hold on to the corner of his robe.’

4.­323

“ ‘Will I not fall?’

“ ‘Dear sir, even if you were to hang Mount Sumeru from the corner of his robe, it would not fall. What need is there to speak of you?’

“With their encouragement, the novice ward went to where his preceptor used his miraculous powers to disappear, and waited. When his preceptor disappeared, the novice ward grabbed hold of the corner of his preceptor’s robe and together they rose into the sky above. After a time, [F.119.a] the nāgas caught sight of them and arranged two seats along with two plates of offerings for them.

4.­324

“The preceptor thought, ‘Why have they set out this second seat and plate of offerings?’ Looking behind him, he saw the novice and asked, ‘Son, you too have come?’

“ ‘Yes, preceptor, I have.’

“ ‘Good.’

4.­325

“The nāgas thought, ‘This noble one has miraculous powers and great might and so can digest divine ambrosia. But this noble novice cannot. We had better give him ordinary food.’

“To the preceptor, they gave divine ambrosia, but to the novice they gave ordinary food. Because the novice generally tended to the preceptor’s begging bowl, he picked up the preceptor’s begging bowl and on doing so, saw that a single grain of rice had stuck to it. The novice put it in his mouth and on tasting it, knew it to be divine ambrosia. He thought, ‘These nāgas are stingy. Two sit down together and to one they give divine ambrosia but to the other they give ordinary food.’

4.­326

“Unable to bear it, he made a misguided prayer, ‘May these roots of virtue from living the holy life under the guidance of the perfectly awakened and blessed Buddha Kāśyapa, an unsurpassed object of veneration, ensure that I be born right here after I have left this land of the nāgas.’

4.­327

“As prodigious and complete actions [S.49.b] are not contingent on a change of body, in that very life water began to drip from the novice’s hands, while the nāga host began to suffer a throbbing headache, prompting him to demand of the preceptor, ‘Noble one, this novice has given rise to an ignoble wish. Make him repudiate it!’

“The preceptor said to the novice, ‘Son, reject your ignoble wish to be among them.’

“Then the novice spoke this verse:

4.­328
“ ‘This wish is so far-reaching,
As I stay here in this land [F.119.b]
With water falling from my hands
I lack the power to reject it.’
4.­329

“Thus, he lost his life in the land of the nāgas only to be reborn again in that very place. And that, monks, is how the youthful, shape-shifting nāga first gained faith.”

Tīrthikas

4.­330

The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when a tīrthika arrived at Jetavana. When this tīrthika saw the fine seats arranged there and the array of communal food and drink, he thought, “As far as culinary pleasures are concerned, these ascetic sons of the Śākya have it good. But as far as the wealth of Dharma is concerned, ours is better. So I shall go forth and take my meals here while taking my Dharma among my fellow tīrthika.”

4.­331

With that thought, he approached a monk and said, “Noble one, I want to go forth”; his going forth was allowed, and he was granted ordination.

4.­332

As the tīrthikas’ purification takes place on the fourteenth day of the month, while the monks’ purification takes place on the fifteenth day of the month, he would participate in the tīrthikas’ purification on the fourteenth day and the monks’ on the fifteenth.

4.­333

After some time, a day was skipped192 and the monks’ purification fell on the fourteenth, which caused him some consternation: “Should I join them there or participate in the purification here?”

4.­334

Then he had an idea: “These ascetic sons of the Śākya are more easy going, but my fellow brahmacārin are bad-tempered. If I don’t join them, they may even split my tally stick, switch out my seat plank, overturn my alms bowl, throw out my staff, and expel me from among my fellow brahmacārin.”

4.­335

And so he attended the tīrthikas’ purification. Meanwhile, the disciplinarian stood at the end of the senior monks’ row. [F.120.a] When the monks were counted, the disciplinarian noticed that the monk, who was still committed to his tīrthika order, was missing so he asked, “Venerables, has the monk [monk’s name] come or sent his consent?”193

“No.”

4.­336

After looking around him into the four directions, the Blessed One declared, “Let us perform the purification.” The monks then looked around them into the four directions and performed the purification. Later that same day, the monk arrived and the monks asked him, “Venerable, where have you come from?”

“From the company of my fellow brahmacārin.”

“Who are your fellow brahmacārin?”

“The tīrthikas, for I enjoy my food with you and my Dharma with them.”

4.­337

The monks then asked the Blessed One about it, and the Blessed One decreed, “Monks, this person is a convert to a tīrthika order. A person who is a convert to a tīrthika order will not take root in this Dharma and Vinaya. Therefore, you must banish from this Dharma and Vinaya those persons who are converts to a tīrthika order. If someone wishing to go forth approaches any of you, you should ask, ‘You are not a convert to a tīrthika order, are you?’ If you allow going forth without asking this, a breach occurs.”

4.­338

The venerable Upāli asked the Blessed One, “Reverend, since the Blessed One has said, ‘You must banish from this Dharma and Vinaya those persons who are converts to a tīrthika order,’ then reverend, what is it that makes those persons who are converts to a tīrthika order fit for exclusion?”

4.­339

“Upāli, he who bears this banner while still being enamored with that view invites the dusk, [S.50.a] and for that alone you must banish from this Dharma and Vinaya those persons who are converts to a tīrthika order.”

Matricides

4.­340

The Blessed Buddha [F.120.b] was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when a householder living in Śrāvastī took a wife of equal caste and together they played with, took pleasure in, and amused one another. The wife with whom he had played, taken pleasure, and amused himself then gave birth to a son, after which the householder said to her, “Noble woman, our debts are spinning out of control and cutting into our savings, so I will take some merchandise to sell in another land.”

She replied, “Son of a lord, do as you wish.”

4.­341

The householder departed with his merchandise for another land where, through indiscretion, he came to misfortune. And so his wife, with the help of relatives and by her own industry, fed and nurtured their son as he grew.

4.­342

In time, the lad went with a peer to a house, where a girl sitting on the house’s roof threw down a bouquet of flowers to catch his notice. His peer asked, “Friend, you haven’t arranged a rendezvous at this house, have you?”

“Indeed I have, and that is our signal,” the lad replied.

“Friend, this house is ill-omened, don’t go in. I warn you, through indiscretion you will come to suffering.”

4.­343

The lad’s friend then led him on a long detour that took the entire day, eventually leading him back to his mother, to whom the lad’s friend said, “Ma’am, your son here has arranged a rendezvous at a girl’s house. I have safeguarded him the whole day, but you must safeguard him through the night. That house is ill-omened. Do not let him go in. Beware, through indiscretion he will come to suffering.”

4.­344

She said, “Son, you have done well to inform me.”

She arranged a bed for her son in the house, along with two clay chamber pots, water, and fresh earth cover, and installed her son in the house, saying, “I myself will sleep on a cot by the door.”

4.­345

“Mother, open the door.”

“Why, son?”

“I must go out and urinate.”

“Son, I have placed a chamber pot there. Urinate in that.”

4.­346

He sat down for a bit and then said, “Mother, open the door.”

“Why, son?” [F.121.a]

“I must go out and defecate.”

“Son, I have placed a chamber pot, water, and fresh earth cover there. Defecate in that.”

4.­347

Again, he sat for a bit before saying, “Mother, open the door.”

“Son, do you think I don’t know where you want to go? I cannot open the door for you.”

“Mother, I shall kill you.”

“Son, I can face my own death, but I couldn’t bear watching my son die.”

4.­348

In the pursuit of passion, there is nothing he would not do. His mind merciless, and forsaking all thought of future lives, he unsheathed his knife and cut off his mother’s head at the neck, which tumbled to the floor. Having killed his mother, he left, trembling like a man who has committed a sin.

4.­349

The girl with whom he had a rendezvous said to him, “Son of a lord, there is no one, there is no other girl but me. Do not be afraid.”

4.­350

Thinking, “She will be pleased if I tell her what I’ve done,” he said, “Noble woman, I have killed my mother for your sake.”

“What? Your wet nurse or the woman who gave birth to you?”

“The woman who gave birth to me.”

4.­351

“He has killed his mother without regard for her importance to him,” thought the girl. “What chance would I stand if at some point he became angry with me?”

Then she said to the lad, “Son of a lord, please wait a moment while I climb up to the roof of the house.” [S.50.b]

“Go ahead,” he replied.

On reaching the roof, she cried out, “A thief! A thief!”

4.­352

The lad, scared and frightened, fled back to his own house and laid his knife at the doorstep before crying out, “That thief has been here! He has killed my mother and fled!”

4.­353

After performing rites of veneration over his mother’s corpse, the lad left home. But a person who has done wrong finds no serenity, so he sought out tīrthika communities and communities of ascetics and asked, “Gentlemen, what can one do to expunge an evil act?” [F.121.b]

4.­354

To that, some said, “Immolate yourself”; some said, “Take poison”; some said, “Jump off a cliff”;194 and some said, “Strangle yourself with a rope.” All of them recommended some form of suicide; none could offer any means of expiation.

4.­355

Later, he went to Jetavana, where he posed his question to a monk, who recited a verse:

“He who has done some wrong
May curb it through virtue
To bring light to this life,
As the sun and moon appear from behind clouds.”
4.­356

On hearing this verse, the lad thought, “Ah! Even wrongdoing can be checked! I shall go forth among these people.” He then approached the monk and said, “Noble one, I want to go forth.”

After his going forth was allowed and he was ordained, he applied himself diligently and began to recite the scriptures. In reciting and saying prayers, he recited and memorized the Three Piṭakas and gained the confidence born of knowledge and freedom.

4.­357

The monks asked him, “Venerable, what motivates such diligence in you?”

“I must expunge a wrongdoing,” he replied.

“What wrongdoing are you guilty of?”

“I killed my mother.”

“Your wet nurse or the woman who gave birth to you?”

“My birth mother.”

4.­358

The monks asked the Blessed One about it, and he said to the monks, “Monks, a person who has killed his mother is fit to be excluded from the community, for a person who has killed his mother will not take root in this Dharma and Vinaya. For that reason, monks, you should exclude from this Dharma and Vinaya those persons who have killed their mothers. If someone wishing to go forth approaches any of you, you should ask, ‘Are you a matricide?’ If you allow going forth without asking this, a breach occurs.”

4.­359

The monk who had killed his mother thought, [F.122.a] “Where will I wind up? I must go into the wilds.” And with that, he went into the wilds, where a householder became his follower. Out of deep devotion, the householder had a monastery erected for the monk, where monks from various regions and lands came to live, many of whom went on to actualize arhatship under his guidance.

4.­360

Sometime later, the monk matricide fell ill. Although the other monks ministered to him with medicinal roots, stalks, leaves, flowers, and fruits, he continued to get worse. The monk matricide then told his wards, “Venerables, prepare a dry sauna for the saṅgha and for me.”

His monk apprentices then prepared a dry sauna for him.

4.­361
All accumulation ends in depletion;
All climbs end in falls;
All meetings end in separation;
All life ends in death.
4.­362

So his time came and he died, and he was reborn among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment. One of his arhat wards entered into meditation to find out where his preceptor had been reborn and began searching for him among the gods, but he did not see him there. Nor did he see him when he looked among humans, animals, and spirits. When he began to search among the denizens of hell, he saw that his preceptor had been reborn among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment.

4.­363

The arhat ward wondered, “If my preceptor was ethical, learned, and attracted a following with the Dharma, what did he do that it should lead him to be reborn among the denizens of Avīci?” [S.51.a] He then saw that it was matricide.

Struck by the fiery light of Avīci, the monk matricide cried, “Oh! The heat in this dry sauna is too much!” As soon as he cried out, the guardians of hell lifted their maces and clubbed him on the head, shouting, “Hapless fool! Where is this dry sauna of yours? This is Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment!” [F.122.b]

4.­364

This virtuous thought195 brought the former monk matricide’s time in hell to an end, and he was reborn among the gods in the realms of the Four Great Kings. It is in the nature of gods and goddesses to have three thoughts shortly after birth: where they have passed on from, where they have been born, and what action has caused that rebirth. Thus the former monk matricide saw he had passed from among the denizens of hell and been reborn among the gods in the realms of the Four Great Kings due to his having washed the dry sauna for the saṅgha.

4.­365

Then the young god, who had formerly been a denizen of hell, had this thought: “It would not be right of me to spend a day here without going to see and pay my respects to the Blessed One. Thus, before the day is out, I shall go to see and pay my respects to the Blessed One.”

4.­366

The young god donned a pair of glittering hooped earrings that swung to and fro, adorned his body with two pearl necklaces, one long and one medium in length, filled the folds of his skirt with the dazzling colors of divine blue lotus flowers, lotuses, water lilies, and white lotuses, and when night had fallen, set out to see the Blessed One. On his arrival, he strewed the flowers before the Blessed One and bowed his head at the Blessed One’s feet before taking a place off to one side. The colors of the young god filled the whole of Jetavana with a great light.

4.­367

As the young god sat on a seat, the Blessed One intuited his thoughts, propensities, disposition, and nature and proceeded to teach the Dharma he needed to hear in order to fully realize each of the Noble Ones’ four truths, thus actualizing the fruit of a stream enterer by decimating with the lightning bolt of wisdom the mountain of belief in the transient aggregates with its twenty tall peaks. [F.123.a]

4.­368

Upon seeing the truth, the young god spoke this panegyric thrice: “Reverend, what the Blessed One has done for me, my father did not do for me, nor did my mother, nor did the king, nor did the gods, nor did my ancestors, nor did ascetics or brahmins, nor did my circle of loved ones and friends, nor did my forebears. For the Blessed One has dried up the ocean of blood and tears, freed me from mountains of bones, shut the door to miserable realms, opened the door to higher realms and liberation, dragged me up by the leg from among the denizens of hell, animals, and spirits, and installed me among gods and humans.”

4.­369

The young god spoke again:

“Because of you, the path to miserable realms
Of terrible and diverse punishments is blocked
And the road to higher realms of great merit has opened.
I have even found the way to nirvāṇa.
4.­370
“By relying on you, one of utter purity,
I have today gained flawless, pure vision,
Have gained the pacific state pleasing to saints,
And crossed over the seas of suffering.
4.­371
“Honored in the world by demi-gods, gods, and men;
Free from birth, aging, illness, and death;
To see you once in a thousand lives is rare‍—
Today, sage, seeing you has proved fruitful.
4.­372
“As I bow with my necklace hanging low,
Prostrate at your feet, I feel jubilant.
Circling the one who has tamed his enemies
I turn to the heavens and fly into the sky.”
4.­373

The young god then departed like a trader who has made a profit, a farmer who has reaped his crops, a warrior who has won a battle, or an ill person who has been delivered from all his ills, and, in the dress in which he arrived in the Blessed One’s presence, returned home.

4.­374

One of the young god’s former wards, an elder in the saṅgha and an arhat, [F.123.b] was seated in the meal row, while another of his wards [S.51.b] was distributing water to the saṅgha. After a time, the saṅgha elder lifted his cup of water. It felt extremely cold to the touch of the tip of his fingers, and he thought, “While we drink water as cold as this, the preceptor drinks molten copper among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment.”

4.­375

Yet when this arhat elder then searched for his preceptor among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment, his preceptor was nowhere to be seen. When the arhat elder searched for him among the animals, spirits, and denizens of other hells, he was nowhere to be seen there either. And so he began to search for him among the gods. There he saw that his preceptor had been reborn among the gods in the realm of the Four Great Kings and, having become a god, saw the truth in the Blessed One’s presence before returning to remain among the gods. Smiling, the arhat elder gained faith in the Blessed One and spoke this panegyric: “O Buddha! O Dharma! O Saṅgha! O the well-spoken Dharma by which even wrongdoers led into such fallen states can attain such a collection of qualities!”

4.­376

A student of the same preceptor saw him looking jubilant, pleased, and overjoyed and asked, “Venerable, are you so jubilant, pleased, and overjoyed by the thought that now that the preceptor’s time has come, you are the saṅgha elder?”

The arhat elder replied, “Venerable, now is not the time to answer your question. Ask me when we are among the saṅgha and that will prove the time to answer your question.”

4.­377

Later, after the monks of the saṅgha gathered and were seated, the saṅgha elder asked their preceptor’s student, “Venerable, what was it you wanted to ask me?”

“I asked you, ‘Venerable, are you so jubilant, pleased, [F.124.a] and overjoyed by the thought that now that the preceptor’s time has come, you are the saṅgha elder?’ ”

4.­378

While seated among the saṅgha, the arhat elder explained the situation at length to his fellow student. His fellow student then also rejoiced, as did the saṅgha, who spoke this panegyric: “O Buddha! O Dharma! O Saṅgha! O the well-spoken Dharma by which even wrongdoers led into fallen states can attain such a collection of qualities!” [B11]

Patricides

4.­379

The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī, when a householder living in Śrāvastī took a wife of equal caste and together they played with, took pleasure in, and amused one another. The wife with whom he had played, taken pleasure, and amused himself later gave birth to a son.

4.­380

In time, the lad went with a peer to a house, where a girl sitting on the house’s roof threw down a bouquet of flowers to catch his attention. His peer asked, “Friend, you haven’t arranged a rendezvous at this house, have you?”

“Indeed I have, and that is our signal,” the lad replied.

4.­381

“Friend, this house is ill-omened, don’t go in. I warn you, through indiscretion you will come to suffering.”

The lad’s friend then led him on a long detour that took the entire day, eventually leading him back to his father, to whom the lad’s friend said, “Sir, your son here has arranged a rendezvous at a girl’s house. I have safeguarded him the whole day so you must safeguard him through the night. That house is ill-omened. Do not let him enter. Beware, through indiscretion he will come to suffering.”

4.­382

“Son, you have done well to inform me.”

He arranged a bed for his son in the house, along with two clay chamber pots, water, and fresh earth cover, and installed his son in the house, saying, “I myself will sleep on a cot by the door.”

4.­383

“Father, open the door.”

“Why, son?”

“I must go out to urinate.”

“Son, [F.124.b] I have placed a chamber pot there. Urinate in that.”

4.­384

He sat down for a bit and then said, “Father, open the door.”

“Why, son?”

“I must go out to defecate.”

“Son, I have placed a chamber pot, water, and fresh earth cover there. Defecate in that.”

4.­385

Again, he sat for a bit before saying, “Father, open the door.”

“Son, do you think I don’t know where you want to go? I cannot open the door for you.”

“Father, I shall kill you.”

“Son, I can face my own death, but I couldn’t bear watching my son die.”

4.­386

In the pursuit of passion, there is nothing he would not do. His mind merciless and forsaking all thought of future lives, he unsheathed his knife and cut off his father’s head at the neck, which tumbled to the floor. Having killed his father, he left, trembling like a man who has committed a sin.

4.­387

The girl with whom he had a rendezvous said to him, “Son of a lord, there is no one, there is no other girl but me. Do not be afraid.”

4.­388

Thinking, “She will be pleased if I tell her what I’ve done,” he said, “Noble woman, I have killed my father for your sake.”

4.­389

“What? Your foster father or the man who fathered you?”

“The man who fathered me.”

The girl thought, “He has killed his father without regard for his importance to him. What chance would I stand if at some point he became angry with me?”

4.­390

Then she said to the lad, “Son of a lord, please wait a moment while I climb up to the roof of the house.”

“Go ahead.”

On reaching the roof, she cried out, “A thief! A thief!”

4.­391

The lad, scared and frightened, fled back to his own house, and laid his knife at the doorstep before crying out, “The thief has been here! He has killed my father and fled!”

4.­392

After performing rites of veneration over his father’s corpse, the lad left home. But a person who has done wrong finds no serenity, so he sought out tīrthika communities and communities of ascetics and asked, “Gentlemen, [F.125.a] what can one do to expunge an evil act?”

4.­393

To that, some said, “Immolate yourself”; some said, “Take poison”; some said, “Jump off a cliff”; some said, “Drown yourself”; and some said, “Strangle yourself with a rope.” All of them recommended some form of suicide; none could offer any means of expiation.

Later, he went to Jetavana, where he posed his question to a monk, who recited a verse:

4.­394
“He who has done some wrong
May curb it through virtue
To bring light to this life,
As the sun and moon appear from behind clouds.”
4.­395

On hearing this verse, the lad thought, “Ah! Even wrongdoing can be checked! I shall go forth among these people.” He then approached the monk and said, “Noble one, I want to go forth.”

4.­396

After his going forth was allowed and he was ordained, he applied himself diligently and began to learn the scriptures. In reciting and saying prayers, he recited and memorized the Three Piṭakas and gained the confidence born of knowledge and freedom.

4.­397

The monks asked him, “Venerable, what motivates such diligence in you?”

“I must expunge a wrongdoing,” he replied.

“What wrongdoing are you guilty of?”

“I killed my father.”

“Your foster father or the man who fathered you?”

“The man who fathered me.”

4.­398

The monks asked the Blessed One about it, and he said to the monks, “Monks, a person who has killed his father is fit to be excluded from the community. A person who has killed his father will not take root in this Dharma and Vinaya. For that reason, you should exclude from this Dharma and Vinaya those persons who have killed their fathers. If someone wishing to go forth approaches any of you, [F.125.b] you should ask, ‘Are you a patricide?’ If you allow going forth without asking this, a breach occurs.”

4.­399

The monk who had killed his father thought, “Where will I wind up? I must go into the wilds.” And with that, he went into the wilds, where a householder became his follower. Out of deep devotion, the householder had a monastery erected for the monk, where monks from various regions and lands came to live, many of whom went on to actualize arhatship under his guidance.

4.­400

Some time later, the monk patricide fell ill. Although the other monks ministered to him with medicinal roots, stalks, leaves, flowers and fruits, he continued to get worse. The monk patricide then told his wards, “Venerables, construct a dry sauna for the saṅgha and for me.”

His monk apprentices then built a dry sauna for him.

4.­401
All accumulation ends in depletion;
All climbs end in falls;
All meetings end in separation;
All life ends in death.
4.­402

So his time came and he died, and he was reborn among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment. One of his arhat wards entered into meditation to find out where his preceptor had been reborn and began searching for him among the gods, but he did not see him there. Nor did he see him when he looked among humans, animals, and spirits. When he began to search among the denizens of hell, he saw that his preceptor had been reborn among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment.

4.­403

The arhat ward wondered, “If my preceptor was ethical, learned, and attracted a following with the Dharma, what did he do that it should lead him to be reborn among the denizens of Avīci?” He then saw that it was patricide.

4.­404

Struck by the fiery light of Avīci, the former monk patricide exclaimed, “Oh! The heat in this dry sauna is too much!” As soon as he cried out, the guardians of hell lifted their maces and clubbed him in the head, shouting, “Hapless fool! Where is this dry sauna of yours? [F.126.a] This is Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment!”

4.­405

This virtuous thought196 brought the monk patricide’s time in hell to an end and he was reborn among the gods in the realms of the Four Great Kings. It is in the nature of gods and goddesses to have three thoughts shortly after birth: where they have passed on from, where they have been born, and what action has caused that rebirth. Thus the former monk patricide saw that he had passed from among the denizens of hell and been reborn among the gods in the realms of the Four Great Kings due to his having washed the dry sauna for the saṅgha.

4.­406

The young god then had this thought: “It would not be right of me to spend a day here without going to see and pay my respects to the Blessed One. Thus, before the day is out, I shall go to see and pay my respects to the Blessed One.”

4.­407

The young god donned a pair of glittering hooped earrings that swung to and fro, adorned his body with two pearl necklaces, one long and one medium in length, filled the folds of his skirt with the dazzling colors of divine blue lotus flowers, lotuses, water lilies, and white lotuses, and when night had fallen, set out for the Blessed One. On his arrival, he strewed the flowers before the Blessed One and bowed his head at the Blessed One’s feet before taking a place off to one side. The colors of the young god filled the whole of Jetavana with a great light.

4.­408

Then, as the young god sat on a seat, the Blessed One intuited his thoughts, propensities, disposition, and nature and proceeded to teach the Dharma he needed to hear in order to fully realize each of the Noble Ones’ four truths. The young god then actualized the fruit of a stream enterer by decimating with the lightning bolt of wisdom the mountain of belief in the transient aggregates with its twenty tall peaks. [F.126.b]

4.­409

Upon seeing the truth, the young god whose patricide had led him to rebirth in hell spoke this panegyric thrice: “Reverend, what the Blessed One has done for me, my father did not do for me, nor did my mother, nor did the king, nor did the gods, nor did my ancestors, nor did ascetics or brahmins, nor did my circle of loved ones and friends, nor did my forebears. For the Blessed One has dried up the ocean of blood and tears, freed me from mountains of bones, shut the door to miserable realms, opened the door to higher realms and liberation, dragged me up by the leg from among the denizens of hell, animals, and spirits, and installed me among gods and humans.”

4.­410

The young god spoke again:

“Because of you, the path to miserable realms
Of terrible and diverse punishments is blocked
And the road to higher realms of great merit has opened.
I have even found the way to nirvāṇa.
4.­411
“By relying on you, one of utter purity, I
Have today gained flawless, pure vision,
I have gained the pacific state pleasing to saints
And crossed over the seas of suffering.
4.­412
“Honored in the world by demi-gods, gods, and men;
Free from birth, aging, illness, and death;
To see you once in a thousand lives is rare‍—
Today, sage, seeing you has proved fruitful.
4.­413
“As I bow with my necklace hanging low,
Prostrate at your feet, I feel jubilant.
Circling clockwise he who has tamed his enemies
I turn to the heavens and fly into the sky.”
4.­414

The young god then departed like a trader who has made a profit, a farmer who has reaped his crops, a warrior who has won a battle, or an ill person who has been delivered from all his ills, and, in the dress in which he arrived in the Blessed One’s presence, returned home. [F.127.a]

4.­415

One of the young god’s former apprentices, an elder in the saṅgha and an arhat, was seated in the meal row, while another of his apprentices was distributing water to the saṅgha. After a time, the saṅgha elder lifted his cup of water. It felt extremely cold to the touch of the tip of his fingers, and he thought, “While we drink water as cold as this, the preceptor drinks molten copper among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment.”

4.­416

Yet when this arhat elder, a former apprentice of the monk patricide, then searched for his preceptor among the denizens of Avīci, the Great Hell of Unrelenting Torment, he was nowhere to be seen. When the arhat elder searched for his preceptor among the animals, spirits, and denizens of other hells, he was nowhere to be seen there either. And so he began to search for him among the gods. There he saw his preceptor had been reborn among the gods in the realm of the Four Great Kings and, having become a god, saw the truth in the Blessed One’s presence before returning to remain among the gods. Smiling, the arhat elder gained faith in the Blessed One and spoke this panegyric: “O Buddha! O Dharma! O Saṅgha! O the well-spoken Dharma by which even wrongdoers led into such fallen states can attain such a collection of qualities!”

4.­417

A student of the same preceptor saw him looking jubilant, pleased, and overjoyed and asked, “Venerable, are you so jubilant, pleased, and overjoyed by the thought that now that the preceptor’s time has come, you are the saṅgha elder?”

4.­418

“Venerable, now is not the time to answer your question. Ask me when we are among the saṅgha and that will prove the time to answer your question.”

4.­419

Later, after the monks of the saṅgha gathered and were seated, the saṅgha elder asked the student of the same preceptor, “Venerable, what was it you wanted to ask me?”

4.­420

“I asked you, ‘Venerable, are you so jubilant, pleased, and overjoyed by the thought that now that the preceptor’s time has come, you are the saṅgha elder?’ ” [F.127.b]

4.­421

While seated among the saṅgha, the arhat elder explained the situation at length to his fellow student. His fellow student then also rejoiced, as did the saṅgha, who spoke this panegyric: “O Buddha! O Dharma! O Saṅgha! O the well-spoken Dharma by which even wrongdoers led into fallen states can attain such a collection of qualities!”


5.

Killing an Arhat

5.­1

A summary:

Killing an arhat, causing a schism in the saṅgha,
Maliciously drawing blood, and
Suffering one of the four defeats
And three types of suspension.

Killing an Arhat

5.­2

The Blessed Buddha was staying at Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park near Śrāvastī. When, in the thick of Yaṣṭī Grove, the Blessed One established in the truths the King of Magadha, Bimbisāra of the Guilds, along with 80,000 gods and hundreds of thousands of Magadhan brahmins and householders, Bimbisāra had the bells rung throughout his land and this pronouncement was read: “No one shall steal in my lands. If anyone does so, I will banish them and provide recompense from my own stores and treasury.”

Causing a Schism in the Saṅgha

Maliciously Drawing Blood from a Tathāgata

Suffering One of the Four Defeats

Three Types of Suspension


6.

Persons whose hands have been cut off

6.­1

An index:

Persons whose hands have been cut off, persons whose legs have been cut off,
Persons with hands of webbed fingers,
Persons with no lips, persons whose bodies have been branded, scarred by a whip, or tattooed,
The very old, the very young,
Persons with mobility impairment, persons with degenerative nerve disorders, persons missing an eye,
Persons whose hands have been cut off, persons with kyphosis, persons of restricted growth,
Persons with goiters, persons with a speech impairment, persons with a hearing impairment,
Persons who use mobility aids, persons with elephantiasis,
Persons worn out by women, persons worn out by burdens,
Persons worn out by the road,
Persons with malabsorption syndromes, and persons with chronic fatigue.
The great seer forbade
People such as this.199
Knowing all, the Perfectly Awakened One,
Whose name denotes truth, proclaimed
That going forth is for the beautiful
And ordination for the pure.

Persons whose hands have been cut off


c.

Colophon

c.­1

This was translated by the Kashmiri preceptor Sarvajñādeva, the Indian preceptor Vidyākaraprabha, the Kashmiri preceptor Dharmākara, and the translator Bandé Palgyi Lhünpo. It was then revised and finalized by the Indian preceptor Vidyākaraprabha and the managing editor-translator, Bandé Paltsek.202


ap.
Appendix

An Outline of the Present Day Ordination Rite

ap1.­1
Giving the Layperson’s Vows and Refuge Precepts

How to Give the Layperson’s Vows

Pledging to Keep the Precepts

Going Forth

Informing the Saṅgha of the Wish to Go Forth

Asking the Preceptor

Allowing the Postulant’s Going Forth

Becoming a Novice

Inducting the Postulant into the Novitiate

Marking the Time

Pledging to Keep the Novice Precepts

The Novice Investiture

Granting Ordination

The Opening Occasion

Asking the Preceptor

Sanction for Robes That Have Already Been Cut and Sewn

Sanction for Robes That Have Not Already Been Cut and Sewn

Displaying the Begging Bowl

Sanction for the Begging Bowl

Seeking the Cooperation of the Privy Advisor

Asking the Saṅgha for an Inquiry into Private Matters

The Inquiry into Private Matters

Reporting the Findings

The Ordinand’s Asking for Ordination

The Act to Ask About Impediments Before the Saṅgha

Inquiring into Impediments Before the Saṅgha

The Monk Officiant’s Asking to Ordain

The Motion to Act

Marking the Time by the Length of a Shadow

Explaining the Different Parts of the Day and Night

Describing the Length of the Seasons

Explaining the Supports

Explaining the Offenses

Explaining Those Things That Constitute Spiritual Practice

Announcing the Perfect Fulfillment of His Greatest Desire

Enjoining Him to Practice the Equally Applicable Ethical Code

Enjoining Him to Bond with His Role Model in the Renunciant Life

Enjoining Him to Dwell in Tranquility

Enjoining Him to Carry Out His Obligations

Informing Him of What He Must Do to Fully Understand His Unspoken Commitments

Enjoining Him to Heed What He Reveres

Enjoining Him in How He Must Practice


ab.

Abbreviations

C Choné
D Degé
H Lhasa (Shöl)
J Lithang
K Beijing Kangxi
KY Yongle
N Narthang
S Stok Palace Manuscript

n.

Notes

n.­1
For a summary in English of the First and Second Councils and the subsequent schism in the saṅgha as recounted in The Chapters on Monastic Discipline, see Rockhill (1907, 148–80). For modern scholarship on the councils and the compiling of the Buddhist canon, see Prebish (1974) and Skilling (2009).
n.­2
See Nattier and Prebish (1977) on the rise of the different schools, with references to both traditional sources and modern scholarship.
n.­3
On the history, dating, and geographical distribution of the Mūlasarvāstivādins and their relation to other schools (especially the Sarvāstivādins), see Frauwallner (1956), Nattier and Prebish (1977), Enomoto (1994), Rosenfeld (2006), Salomon (2006), and Clarke (2004a and forthcoming). The six complete extant codes are the Sarvāstivādin’s Ten Recitations in Chinese with fragmentary Sanskrit; the Mūlasarvāstivādin’s Collection of Four Scriptures in Tibetan and partial Sanskrit and Chinese; the Theravādin’s canonical Suttavibhaṅga, Khandhaka, and Appendices (Parivāra) and paracanonical Pātimokkha and Kammavācanā in Pali; the Dharmaguptaka’s Four Part Vinaya in Chinese and partial Sanskrit; the Mahīśāsaka’s Five Part Vinaya in Chinese; and the Mahāsāṃghika’s Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya in Chinese. See Clarke (2004a, 77–78) and Prebish (2003).
n.­4
The Vinayavastu (Toh 1), the Prātimokṣasūtra (Toh 2), the Vinayavibhaṅga (Toh 3), the Bhikṣuṇī Prātimokṣasūtra (Toh 4), the Bhikṣuṇī Vinayavibhaṅga (Toh 5), the Kṣudrakavastu (Toh 6), and two versions of the Uttaragrantha‍—the incomplete ’dul ba gzhung bla ma (Toh 7) and the complete ’dul ba gzhung dam pa (Toh 7a). For more on the Uttaragrantha (’dul ba gzhung dam pa and ’dul ba gzhung bla ma), see Kishino (2007, 1221, and 2013) and Clarke (2012).
n.­5
The Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya differs significantly in its structure from the other extant vinayas. See Frauwallner (1956) and Clarke (2004a).
n.­6
See Finnegan (2009, 10–28), for an overview of the history, language, and role of narrative in the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya. For readers of German, see Panglung (1981). In English, see also Schopen (2000, 94–99) and, for reference to the inclusion of narrative and sūtra in the Pali vinaya, see von Hinüber (1996).
n.­7
See Heirman (2008) and Kishino (2013) for Yijing and his translations into Chinese.
n.­8
See Rotman (2008, 15–30) for a discussion of the Divyāvadāna and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya, and Rotman (2008) and (2017) for English translations of portions of the text.
n.­161
The translation of g-yar bltam (“fill his own mouth”) is speculative.
n.­162
All of these are ancient stringed instruments (Kalyāṇamitra, folios 287.a.7–b.1).
n.­163
A set of twenty-five sūtras from the Nidānasaṃyukta Sanskrit original were recovered between 1902 and 1914 in Gāndhāra by the German Turfan expeditions and later studied by Tripāṭhī (1962). Glass and Allon (2007, 29–31) report that no Tibetan translation of this work survives.
n.­164
Following NH: zhal gyi sgo nas (“from your mouth”) instead of D: zhal gyi sgros nas (“from your lips”) (Pedurma, 752) and Kalyāṇamitra (F.291.b.1).
n.­165
Following NH: bstan (short for lung bstan) instead of D: brtan (Pedurma, 752) and Kalyāṇamitra (F.291.b.1.4).
n.­166
That is, give rise to the vows (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 292.a.4).
n.­167
Following Kalyāṇamitra, read las ’thob for las thos. Kalyāṇamitra (F.292.6–7) explains that “sentence” (Tib. las, Skt. karma) here refers to a “punitive act” (Tib. chad pa’i las, Skt. daṇḍakarman).
n.­168
A group of six (Skt. ṣaḍvārgikāḥ, Tib. drug sde) of the Buddha’s disciples‍—Nanda, Upananda, Udāyin, Aśvaka, Punarvasu, and Chanda (Kalyāṇamitra, folios 292.a.7–b.1)‍—whose antics and heavy-handed interference prompted a great many of the Buddha’s injunctions on conduct, as recounted in the Vinayavibhaṅga.
n.­169
The old-timer is challenging them by pointing out that the Buddha had no preceptor but rather was “self-ordained.” Naturally, this would strike the monks as hubris and spark a sharp reaction.
n.­170
The unspoken qualification here is that the person in question participates in these rites under false pretenses, that is, without having been properly ordained. Someone who twice participates in the purification, or any of the other one hundred and one types of saṅgha activities, under false pretenses becomes an impostor. If he does it a third time, he demonstrates his intractability and is henceforth considered “an inveterate impostor” (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 293.a.1–3).
n.­171
Strictly speaking, this should read, “I’m a person labeled a paṇḍaka,” but the context makes clear that of the five types of person labeled a paṇḍaka described below, he is an intersex person (Tib. skyes nas ma ning, Skt. jātyāpaṇḍaka) and so the phrase has been translated here accordingly.
n.­172
That is, provided they do not demonstrate an interest in having intercourse with others (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 293.a.5–6).
n.­173
One of the Four Āgama into which the Mūlasarvāstivādin tradition grouped the Buddha’s early sūtra discourses, the Ekottarikāgama (Tib. lung gcig las ’phros pa) is a collection of the Buddha’s sayings arranged numerically, from one to one hundred (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 293.b.3–5). It is known in the Pali tradition as the Aṅguttara Nikāya. Though the Ekottarikāgama was no longer extant in Kalyāṇamitra’s lifetime, its contents were vaguely known from descriptions in other extant works (Kalyāṇamitra, Extensive Commentary , folio 293.b.4–5). Although Tibetan translators of the later spread of Buddhism (tenth to thirteenth centuries and later) “almost completely ignored the āgama literature” in preference for Mahāyāna sutras, the Ekottarikāgama was apparently translated into Tibetan, as Marcelle Lalou located a reference in the Denkarma (ldan dkar ma) catalog to a translation of the text carried out during Trisong Deutsen’s reign (Glass and Allon, 2007, 31).
n.­174
It was not uncommon for individuals, monk and layman both, to “own” temples and monasteries. As owner, these individuals took it upon themselves to provide basic necessities to the residents and arriving monks. See Schopen (2010).
n.­175
Apart from the plates, these items are all found among the thirteen “subsistence items” or “essential possessions” (Tib. ’tsho ba’i yo byad, Skt. jīvopāya) allowed to monks by the Buddha (nor brang, 2008, 2805–6).
n.­176
Referring presumably to the arriving monks and departing monks hosted at the monastery who, as monks with leave to wander, would have possessed the five qualities discussed earlier, and hence a fair amount of knowledge.
n.­177
The benefits and drawbacks of an ocean voyage were broadcast with each call, and with each announcement the ropes were cut, thus initiating the journey (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 295.b.4–6).
n.­178
Kalyāṇamitra explains that, at the time of Saṅgharakṣita’s visit, these buddhas had not yet visited these sanctuaries (Tib. dri gtsang khang, Skt. gandhakuṭī). They would, however, serve as residences for these buddhas after our world has been destroyed in the “eon of destruction.”
n.­179
These four āgama (Tib. lung), or discourses, still form the core of the Pali canon’s Sūtrapiṭaka. By assigning their recitation and memorization to young nāgas, the shape shifter was taking a concrete step towards establishing the Buddha’s sūtras in the land of the nāgas, the express purpose for abducting Saṅgharakṣita.
n.­180
Patronage (Tib. yon, Skt. dakṣiṇā) is an offering made in faith or in payment for ritual services. If a monk observes his vows purely, he may receive, and use, extensive patronage, as much as “one hundred thousand items of clothing, one hundred thousand dishes of food, and five hundred houses,” provided he receives it with “the thought of nirvaṇa” (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 296.b.6–7). However, if he is lax in his observance of his ethics, he is not entitled to patronage and the consequences of seeking it are dire. As the Buddha said in the Vinayavibhaṅga, “For one without pure vows and whose ethics are lax, / It is far better / To eat fiery iron balls / Than alms collected from surrounding communities” (Vinayavibhaṅga, Degé, folio 217.a).
n.­181
The explanations of how these beings came to take such forms come below, see 4.­291.
n.­182
Cow dung is still widely used in India to replaster the walls and floors of rural dwellings. Cow dung is considered sanitary and counted among the “five cow products” (Tib. ba byung lnga, Skt. pañca gavya)‍—urine, dung, milk, butter, and curd‍—considered pure and used in certain rituals (dung dkar, 2002, p. 1378).
n.­183
The following verse is the first in the Brāhmaṇavarga, the last of thirty-three chapters in the Udānavarga, a collection of verses on various topics attributed to the Buddha. For a study of the edited text in Sanskrit see Bernhard (1965) and for a study of its relation to The Gāndhārī Dharmapada, see Brough (2001).
n.­184
Though all versions of the Kangyur read ’byung mi ’gyur (“do not arise”) (Pedurma, 758), the translation follows Kalyāṇamitra’s commentary, which gives ’byang mi ’gyur (“do not purify”) (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 297.b.2).
n.­185
The Nagaropama Sutta in the Pali canon’s Aṅguttara Nikāya is a wholly different sūtra from the one cited here, which in Pali is known as the Nagara Sutta and is found in the Saṃyutta Nikāya. For a comparative translation of the Pali Nagara Sutta and the Sanskrit Nagaropama Sūtra, see Tan (2005). A reconstruction and translation of the Sanskrit version of the Nagaropama Sūtra found in Turfan was published and edited by Bongard-Levin et al. (1996).
n.­186
The text gives Tib. spyod pa can, Skt. caraka, which we have chosen to render as sādhu following Kalyāṇamitra’s description of the caraka as a “tīrthika-style renunciant” (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 301.a.4–5). Though the use of sādhu here may be anachronistic, it has the proper implications and is reasonably familiar to non-specialists.
n.­187
Though all versions of the Kangyur read yang dag par gyur pa (“pure”) (Pedurma, p. 759), the translation follows Kalyāṇamitra’s commentary, which gives yangs par gyur pa (“prodigious”) (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 301.a.7).
n.­188
That is, the five realms of gods, humans, animals, spirits, and hell-denizens (Nordrang 2008, 2987).
n.­189
Not only is the monk in question an arhat, he also occupies a position of considerable importance at the monastery and thus their treatment of him is both rude and insubordinate.
n.­190
Learning the six fields of Vedic knowledge.
n.­191
This phrase underlines the meaning of “alms” in Tibetan (bsod snyoms): rather than being simply a charitable offering, by “equalising merit” between the lay donor and the monastic recipient, it affords the opportunity to create links between the individuals concerned as well as between their respective communities.
n.­192
Lunar-based calendar systems give precedence to the moon’s phases, leading to a calendar year of 360 days, divided into twelve months of thirty days apiece. Since it takes the earth 365¼ days to make a complete revolution around the sun, lunar calendars must add or subtract days and even months to keep the calendar properly aligned with the earth’s place in its solar orbit.
n.­193
If a monk is unable to attend an official saṅgha function such as the purification in person, he must offer his proxy to a competent monk (Tib. yul las byed pa’i dge ’dun) who, when prompted, must repeat a formula three times expressing that the absent monk has no objections and will abide by the acts enacted by the assembly (Nyima, 2009, 408). Further details on such procedures can be found in the Poṣadavastu, the second chapter of the Vinayavastu.
n.­194
When the episode of patricide is recounted below on 4.­397, the text includes yet another suggestion‍—“Some said, ‘Drown yourself,’ ”‍—between jumping off a cliff and strangling oneself.
n.­195
Kalyāṇamitra suggests that the virtuous thought that prompted the matricide’s passing from hell to heaven was his allowing the guardians to kill him (Kalyāṇamitra, folio 304.a.3). This served as the precipitating condition to activate the actual karmic cause for his rebirth as a god, his washing the dry sauna, as stated later in the paragraph.
n.­196
See n.­195.
n.­199
See the Vinayakṣudraka for further conditions that disqualify a person from ordination.
n.­202
This colophon does not actually appear until the end of the entire Vinayavastu (Degé, vol. 4 (’dul ba, nga), folio 302.a). It has been inserted here for ease of reference.

b.

Bibliography

The Translated Text: “The Chapter on Going Forth”

rab tu ’byung ba’i gzhi (Pravrajyā­vastu). Toh 1, ch. 1, Degé Kangyur, vol. 1 (’dul ba, ka), folios 1.a–131.a.

rab tu ’byung ba’i gzhi. bka’ ’gyur (dpe sdur ma) [“Pedurma” Comparative Edition of the Kangyur], krung go’i bod rig pa zhib ’jug ste gnas kyi bka’ bstan dpe sdur khang (The Tibetan Tripitaka Collation Bureau of the China Tibetology Research Center). Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2006–2009, vol. 1, pp. 3–308 and pp. 722–67.

Vogel, Claus and Klaus Wille (1984). “Some Hitherto Unidentified Fragments of the Pravrajyā­vastu Portion of the Vinaya­vastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit,” in Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1–41. Göttingen: Philologisch-Historische Klasse, 1984.

‍—‍—‍—(1992). “Some More Fragments of the Pravrajyā­vastu Portion of the Vinaya­vastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit: Part 1: Saṅgha­rakṣitāvadāna,” in Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen III, edited by Heinz Bechert et al, 65–109. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992.

‍—‍—‍—(1996a). “The Final Leaves of the Pravrajyā­vastu Portion of the Vinaya­vastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit: Part 1: Saṅgha­rakṣitāvadāna,” in Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen III, edited by G. Bongard-Levin et al, 241–96. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996a.

‍—‍—‍—(1996b). “The Final Leaves of the Pravrajyā­vastu Portion of the Vinaya­vastu Manuscript Found Near Gilgit. Part 2. Nāga­kumārāvadāna and a Kučā Fragment of the Upa­sampadā Section of the Sarvāstivādins,” in Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen IV, edited by J. Ching et al, 11–76. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996b.

The Commentary to “The Chapter on Going Forth”

Ācārya Kalyāṇamitra. ’dul ba gzhi rgya cher ’grel ba (Vinaya­vastu­ṭīkā, “An Extensive Commentary on the Chapters on Monastic Discipline”). Toh 4113, Degé Tengyur, vol. 156 (’dul ba, tsu), folios 177.b–326.b.

Works Cited in Introduction and Endnotes

Tibetan and Sanskrit Reference Works

’dul ba rnam par ’byed pa (Vinaya­vibhaṅga, “An Analysis of Monastic Discipline”). Toh 2, Degé Kangyur, vols. 5–9 (’dul ba, ca–nya).

Bagchi, Sitansusekhar. Mūla­sarvāstivāda­vinaya­vastu, 2 vols. Darbhanga: Mithila Research Institute, 1970.

Dungkar Losang Trinlé (dung dkar blo bzang phrin las). dung dkar bod rig pa’i tshig mdzod chen mo (“Dungkar’s Complete Tibetological Dictionary”). Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2002.

Dutt, Nalinaksha. Gilgit Manuscripts, vol. III, part I–IV. Calcutta: Calcutta Oriental Press, 1939–59.

Guṇaprabha. ’dul ba’i mdo’i ’grel pa mngon par brjod pa rang gi rnam par bshad pa (Vinaya­sūtra­vṛttyabhi­dhāna­sva­vyākhyāna, “An Autocommentary to the Vinayasūtra”). Toh 4119. Degé Tengyur, vols. 160 and 161 (’dul ba, zhu and zu), folios 1.a–274.a.

Jinamitra and Lui Gyaltsen (klu’i rgyal mtshan, trans.). ’dul ba rnam par ’byed pa’i tshig rnam par bshad pa (Vinaya­vibhaṅga­pada­vyākhyāna, “An Explanation of the Words of the Vinaya­vibhaṅga”). Toh 4114. Degé Tengyur, vol. 157 (’dul ba, tshu), folios 1.a–207.b.7.

Khetsun Zangpo (mkhas btsun bzang po). bdag cag rnams kyi ston mchog don kun grub pa dang de’i rjes ’jug rgya gar pan grub mang po’i rnam par thar pa ngo mtshar padmo’i ’dzum zhal gsar du bzhad pa (“A Biographical Dictionary of Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism, Volume One: The Arhats, Siddhas, and Paṇḍitas of India”). Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1973.

Mipham Gyatso (mi pham rgya mtsho). mkhas pa’i tshul la ’jug pa’i sgo zhes bya ba’i bstan bcos (“Gateway to Knowledge”). In dkar rnying gi skyes chen du ma’i phyag rdzogs kyi gdams ngag gnad bsdus nyer mkho rin po che’i gter mdzod, vol. 25, pp. 1–469. BDRC W20749. Darjeeling: Kargyu Sungrab Nyamso Khang, 1978–85.

Negi, J. Tibetan-Sanskrit Dictionary, Vols. 1–16. Sarnath: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, 1993–2005.

Nordrang, Orgyan (nor brang, o rgyan). gangs can rig brgya’i chos kyi rnam grangs mthong tshad kun las btus pa ngo mtshar ’phrul gyi sde mig chen po (“A Great and Wondrous Key: A Compendium of All the Enumerations from the Snow Land’s One Hundred Fields of Knowledge”), vols. 1-3. Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2008.

Nyima, Geshé Tsewang (dge bshes tshe dbang nyi ma). dam chos ’dul ba gtso gyur gyi gzhung sne mang las btus pa’i tshig mdzod mun sel sgron me (“A Lamp to Dispel Darkness: A Dictionary Drawing on a Variety of Texts but Focusing on the Sublime Vinaya”). Taipei: The Corporate Body of the Buddha Educational Foundation, 2009.

Tāranātha (I). dam pa’i chos rin po che ’phags pa’i yul du ji ltar dar ba’i tshul (“How the Sublime and Precious Dharma Spread in the Land of the Āryas”). In jo nang rje btsun ta’a ra na’a tha’i gsung ’bum dpe bsdur ma, vol. 75, pp. 1–270. Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2007. For English translation, see Chimpa (1990).

‍—‍—‍—(II). bcom ldan ’das thub pa’i dbang po’i mdzad pa mdo tsam brjod pa mthong bas don ldan rab tu dga’ ba dang bcas pas dad pa’i nyin byed phyogs brgyar ’char ba (“The Sun of Confidence That Brings Meaning and Joy On Sight and Illuminates All Directions, a Brief Account of the Deeds of the Blessed Śākyamuni”). In gsung ’bum, vol. 12. Leh: C. Namgyal and Tsewang Taru, 1982-1987.

Mahāvyutpatti, bye brag rtogs byed chen po (“The Great Glossary”). Toh 4346, Degé Tengyur vol. 306 (sna tshogs, co), folios 1b–131a; also Sakaki, Ryozaburo, ed. (1916–25); reprint, 1965; and Delhi: Tibetan Religious and Cultural Publication Centre (bod gzhung shes rig dpe khang), 2000.

Viśeṣamitra (khyad par bshes gnyen). ’dul ba bsdus pa (Vinaya­saṁgraha, “A Summary of the Vinaya”). Degé Tengyur, vol. 151 (’dul ba, nu), folios 88.a–268.a.

Works Cited in English and Other Languages

Bailey, Greg and Ian Mabbett. The Sociology of Early Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Banerjee, Anukul Chandra. Sarvāstivāda Literature. Calcutta: World Press, 1957.

Basham, A.L. History and Doctrines of the Ājīvikas: A Vanished Indian Religion. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1981.

Baya, D.S. ‘Śreyas’. Samādhimaraṇa: Death With Equanimity: The Pursuit of Immortality. Jaipur: Prakrit Bharati Academy, 2007.

Begley, Wayne Edison. Vishnu’s Flaming Wheel: The Iconography of the Sudarsana-Cakra. New York: New York University Press, 1973.

Bernhard, Franz. Udānavarga. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprech, 1965.

Bodhi, Bhikkhu. The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Samyutta Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2003.

Bongard-Levin, Gregory, Daniel Boucher, Takamichi Fukita, and Klaus Wille. “The Nagaropamasūtra, An Apotropaic Text from the Saṃyuktāgama: A Transliteration, Reconstruction, and Translation of the Central Asian Sanskrit Manuscript.” In Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen, edited by Gregory Bongard-Levin, Daniel Boucher, Fumio Enomoto, Takamichi Fukita, Hisashi Matsumura, Claus Vogel and Klaus Wille, 7–131. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden, Beiheft 6. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.

Bronkhorst, Johannes (1998). The Two Sources of Indian Asceticism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1998.

‍—‍—‍—(2000). “The Riddle of the Jainas and the Ājīvikas in Early Buddhist Literature.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 28 (2000): 511–29.

‍—‍—‍—(2003). “Ājīvika Doctrine Reconsidered.” In Essays in Jaina Philosophy and Religion, edited by Piotr Balcerowicz, 153–78. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2003.

‍—‍—‍—(2007). Greater Magadha: Studies in the Culture of Early India. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2007.

‍—‍—‍—(2011). Buddhism in the Shadow of Brahminism. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2011.

‍—‍—‍—(2012). “Ājīvika”. In Brill’s Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. IV, edited by Knut A. Jacobsen, et al. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2012.

Brough, John. The Gandhari Dharmapada. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2001.

Burnell, Arthur Coke. On the Aindra School of Sanskrit Grammars: Their Place in the Sanskrit and Subordinate Literatures. Mangalore: Basel Hisbiok Press, 1875.

Burnouf, Eugène. Introduction à l’histoire du buddhisme indien, vol. 1. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1844. Translation in English as: Buffetrille, Katia, and Lopez, Donald S. Junior. Intoduction to the History of Indian Buddhism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.

Cabezón, José Ignacio. “Homosexuality and Buddhism.” In Homosexuality and World Religions, edited by Arlene Swidler, 81–101. Valley Forge: Trinity Press International, 1993.

Chattopadhyaya, Deprisasad. Lokāyata: A Study of Ancient Indian Materialism. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House, 1959.

Chakravarti, Uma. The Social Dimensions of Early Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Chang, Kun. A Comparative Study of the Kathiṇavastu. Indo-Iranian Monographs, Vol. 1. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co., 1957.

Chimpa, Lama and Alaka Chattopadhyaya (trans.). Tāranātha’s History of Buddhism in India. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1990.

Chodron, Gelongma Karma Migme (trans.) Étienne Lamotte’s translation of The Treatise on the Great Virtue of the Wisdom of Nāgārjuna (Mahā­prajñā­pāramitā­śāstra) , Vol. II, Chapter XIV-XXX. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/44590877/Lamotte-E-Traite-Engl-trans-Mahaprajnaparamitasastra-02, 19 June 2013.

Chung, Jin-il. Die Pravāraṇā in den kanonischen Vinaya-Texten der Mūla­sarvāsti­vādin und der Sarvāsti­vādin. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998.

Clarke, Shayne (2004a). “Vinaya Mātṛkā: Mother of the Monastic Codes, or Just Another Set of Lists? A Response to Frauwallner’s Handling of the Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya.” Indo-Iranian Journal 47 (2004): 77–120.

‍—‍—‍—(2004b). “Right Section, Wrong Collection: An Identification of a Canonical Text in the Tibetan bsTan ’gyur ‍— Bya ba’i phung po zhes bya ba (Kriyāskandha-nāma).” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 124, no. 2 (Apr–Jun 2004): 335–40.

‍—‍—‍—(2012). “Multiple Mūlasarvāstivādin Monascticisms: On the Affiliation of the Tibetan Nuns’ Lineages and Beyond.” Paper presented at Oslo, June 2012.

‍—‍—‍—(2014). Vinaya Texts. Gilgit Manuscripts in the National Archives of India: Facsimile Edition. Volume 1. New Delhi and Tokyo: The National Archives of India and the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University, 2014.

‍—‍—‍—(forthcoming). Towards a Comparative Study of the Sarvāstivāda- and Mūla­sarvāsti­vāda-vinayas: A Preliminary Survey of the Kathāvastu Embedded in the Uttaragrantha. XVIth Congress of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 2011. Publication forthcoming.

Csoma de Körös, Alexander. Analysis of the Dulva: A Portion of the Tibetan Work Entitled the Kah-gyur. Calcutta: Asiatik Researches, 1836.

Dharmachakra Translation Group (2018). The Sūtra of the Wheel of Dharma (Dharmacakrasūtra, Toh 337). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2018.

‍—‍—‍—(2020). The Ratnaketu Dhāraṇī (Mahā­sannipāta­ratna­ketu­dhāraṇī, Toh 138). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha, 2020.

Doniger, Wendy. The Hindus: An Alternative History. New York: Penguin Press, 2013.

Dotson, Brandon. “‘Emperor’ Mu rug btsan and the ’Phang thang ma Catalogue.” Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies 3 (December 2007): THL #T3105, 25 pp, http://www.thlib.org/collections/texts/jiats/#!jiats=/03/dotson/

Dudjom, Jikdrel Yeshe Dorje. Perfect Conduct: Ascertaining the Three Vows. Translated by Lama Chonam and Sangye Khandro. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999.

Dutt, Sukumar (1924). Early Buddhist Monachism. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1924.

‍—‍—‍—(1962). Buddhist Monks and Monasteries of India. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1962.

Eimer, Helmut. Rab tu ’byuṅ ba’i gzhi: die tibetische Übersetzung des Pravrajyāvastu im Vinaya der Mūla­sarvāsti­vādins. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1983.

Enomoto, Fumio. A Comprehensive Study of the Chinese Saṃyuktāgama: Indic Texts Corresponding to the Chinese Saṃyuktāgama as Found in the Sarvāstivāda-Mūlasarvāstivāda Literature. Kyoto: Kacho Junior College, 1994.

Finnegan, Damchö Diana. “For the Sake of Women Too: Ethics and Gender in the Narratives of the Mūla­sarvāsti­vāda Vinaya.” PhD diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2009.

Frauwallner, Erich. The Earliest Vinaya and the Beginnings of Buddhist Literature. Rome: Instituto Italiano per Il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, 1956.

Gethin, Rupert. “The Matikas: Memorization, Mindfulness and the List.” In In the Mirror of Memory: Reflections on Mindfulness and Remembrance in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism, edited by Janet Gyatso, 149–72. Albany: State University of New York, 1992.

Glass, Andrew and Mark Allon. Four Gāndhārī Saṃyuktāgama Sūtras: Senior Kharoṣṭhī Fragment 5. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2007.

Gyatso, Janet. “One Plus One Makes Three: Buddhist Gender, Monasticism, and the Law of the Non-excluded Middle.” History of Religions 43, no. 2 (November 2003): 89–115.

Heirman, Ann. “Indian Disciplinary Rules and the Early Chinese Adepts: A Buddhist Reality.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 128, no. 2 (2008): 257–72.

Hirakawa, Akira. A History of Indian Buddhism: From Śākyamuni to Early Māhāyana. Translated by Paul Groner. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press, 1990.

Hiraoka, Satoshi (trans.). Budda ga nazotoku sanze no monogatari: Diviya avadāna zen’yaku, 2 vols. Tokyo: Daizō shuppan, 2007.

Hu-von Hinüber, Haiyan,  Das Poṣadhavastu: Vorschriften für die buddhistische Beichtfeier im Vinaya der Mūla­sarvāsti­vāda­vinaya. Reinbeck: Verlag für Orientalistische Fachpublikationen, 1994.

Jain, Simmi. Encyclopaedia of Indian Women Through the Ages: The Middle Ages, Vol. 2. Delhi: Kalpaz Publications, 2003.

Jaini, P.S. “Śramaṇas: Their Conflict with Brāhmaṇical Society.” In Chapters in Indian Civilization, Vol. 1, edited by J.W. Elder, 49–96. Dubuque: Kendall-Hunt, 1970.

Jettmar. Karl. “The Gilgit Manuscripts: Discovery by Installments.” Journal of Central Asia 4, no. 2 (1981): 1–18. Jyväsjärvi, Mari Johanna. “Fragile Virtue: Interpreting Women’s Monastic Practice in Early Medieval India.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 2011.

Kishino, Ryoji. “Two Uttaragranthas: A Consideration of the Upāliparipṛcchā.” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu) (2006-2007) 55, no. 1 (2002): 385–82, 1221.

‍—‍—‍—(2013). “A Study of the Nidāna: An Underrated Canonical Text of the Mūla­sarvāsti­vāda-Vinaya.” PhD diss., University of California at Los Angeles, 2013.

Kloppenborg, Rita. “The Earliest Buddhist Ritual of Ordination.” In Selected Studies on Ritual in the Indian Religions: Essays to D.J. Hoens, edited by Dirk Jan Hoens and Rita Kloppenborg, 158–68. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 1983.

Kumar, Raj. Encyclopaedia of Untouchables Ancient, Medieval and Modern, Vol. 1 & 2. Delhi: Kalpaz Publications, 2008.

Likhitpreechakul, Paisarn. “Semen, Viagra and Paṇḍaka: Ancient Endocrinology and Modern Day Discrimination.” Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies, 3 (2012): 91–127.

Lin, Nancy G. “Adapting the Buddha’s Biographies: A Cultural History of the Wish-Fulfilling Vine in Tibet, Seventeenth to Eighteenth Centuries.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley, 2011.

MacQueen, Graeme. A Study of the Śrāmaṇyaphala Sūtra. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1978.

Martin, Dan (2011). Tibskrit Philology 2011. Digital download from author’s “Tibetological” website https://sites.google.com/site/tibetological/

‍—‍—‍—(2002). “Tracing the Tibetan Teaching Transmission of the Mngon-pa Kun-btus (Abhi­dharma­samuccaya) through the Early Period of Disunity.” In The Many Canons of Tibetan Buddhism, edited by Helmut Eimer and David Germano, 335–57. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2002.

Matsumura, Hisashi (1996). “The Kaṭhinavastu from the Vinayavastu of the Mūla­sarvāsti­vādins.” In Sanskrit-Texte aus dem buddhistischen Kanon: Neuentdeckungen und Neueditionen III, edited by Jens Uwe-Hartmann, Klaus Wille, Claus Vogel, and Günter Grönbold, 145–239. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.

‍—‍—‍—(2007). “A Vinaya Lexical Study: Kaṭhina in the Kaṭhinavastu.” In Studia Indologica. Professor Satya Ranjan Banerjee Felicitation Volume, edited by Jagat Ram Bhattacharyya, 35–57. Delhi: Eastern Book Linkers, 2007.

Morgan, Les. Croaking Frogs: A Guide to Sanskrit Metrics and Figures of Speech. Seattle: Mahodara Press, 2011.

Nattier, Janice J. and Charles S. Prebish. “Mahāsāmghika Origins: The Beginnings of Buddhist Sectarianism.” History of Religions 16, no. 3 (February 1977): 237–72.

Ñāṇamoli Bhikkhu and Bhikkhu Bodhi. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Majjima Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1995.

Olivelle, Patrick. The Āśrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Panglung, Jampa Lobsang. Die Erzählstoffe des Mūlasarvāstivāda-Vinaya: Analysiert auf Grund der Tibetischen Übersetzung. Tokyo: Reiyukai Library, 1981.

Prebish, Charles S. (1974). “A Review of Scholarship on the Buddhist Councils.” The Journal of Asian Studies 33, no. 2 (1974): 239–54.

‍—‍—‍—(1994). A Survey of Vinaya Literature, Vol. 1. Taipei: Jin Luen Publishing House, 1994.

______(2003). “Varying the Vinaya: Creative Responses to Modernity.” In Buddhism in the Modern World: Adaptations of an Ancient Tradition, edited by Steven Heine and Charles S. Prebish, 45–73. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Raine, Roberta. “The Translator in Tibetan History: Identity and Influence.” Forum 8, no. 2 (2010): 133–61.

Rockhill, William Woodville. The Life of the Buddha and the Early History of His Order. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., 1907.

Rosenfeld, John M. “Prologue: Some Debate Points on Gāndhāran Buddhism and Kuṣāna History.” In Gandharan Buddhism: Archaeology, Art, and Texts, edited by Pia Brancaccio and Kurt Behrendt. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2006.

Rotman, Andy (2008). Divine Stories: Divyāvadāna, Part 1. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2008.

‍—‍—‍—(2017). Divine Stories: Divyāvadāna, Part 2. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2017.

Ruegg, David Seyfort. The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1981.

Salomon, Richard. “New Manuscript Sources for the Study of Gandhāran Buddhism.” In Gandhāran Buddhism: Archaeology, Art, Texts, edited by Pia Brancaccio and Kurt Behrendt, 135–47. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2006.

Samuel, Geoffrey. The Origins of Yoga and Tantra: Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century. Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Schopen, Gregory (2000). “Hierarchy and Housing in a Buddhist Monastic Code: A Translation of the Śāyanāsana­vastu.” Buddhist Literature, Vol. 2, 92–196. Berkeley: Institute of Buddhist Studies, 2000.

‍—‍—‍—(2010). “The Lay Ownership of Monasteries and the Role of the Monk in Mūlasarvāstivādin Monasticism.” In Indian Monastic Buddhism: Collected Papers on Textual, Inscriptional and Archaeological Evidence, 219–57. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2010.

Shono, Masanori. Bukkyo ni okeru uki no toryuseikatsu ni kansuru kisoteki kenkyu – Varṣāvastu no sai-kotei, oyobi dokkai kenyu (“A Fundamental Study on the Rain Retreat in Buddhism – A Re-edition of the Varṣāvastu and Its Annotated Translation”). Osaka, 2007.

‍—‍—‍—(2010). “A Re-edited Text of the Varṣāvastu in the Vinayavastu and a Tentative Re-edited Text of the Varṣikavastu in the Vinayasūtra.” Acta Tibetica et Buddhica 3 (2010): 1–128.

Skilling, Peter (1994). “Kanjur Titles and Colophons.” In Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 6th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Vol. 2, edited by Per Kvaerne, 768–80. Oslo: Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, 1994.

‍—‍—‍—(2003). “Traces of the Dharma: Preliminary Reports on Some ye dhammā and ye dharmā Inscriptions from Mainland South-East Asia.” In Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient, 90–91 (2003–2004), pp 273–287.

‍—‍—‍—(2009). “Redaction, Recitation, and Writing: Transmission of the Buddha’s Teaching in India in the Early Period.” In Buddhist Manuscript Cultures: Knowledge, Ritual, and Art, edited by Stephen C. Berkwitz, Juliane Schober, and Claudia Brown, 53–75. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.

Sobhita, Kosgoda. Le Cīvaraskandhaka du Vinaya­piṭaka des Mūla­sarvāsti­vādin: Traduction française annotée et étude comparée avec le Cīvaraskandhaka de Pāli. Paris: École Pratique des Hautes Études, 1967.

Strong, John S. The Legend of King Aśoka: A Study and Translation of the Aśokāvadāna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1989.

Sykes, Lieutenant-Colonel. “On the Miniature Chaityas and Inscriptions of the Buddhist Religious Dogma, Found in the Ruins of the Temple of Sárnáth, near Benares.” In Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1856), vol. 16, pp 37-53.

Tatelman, Joel. The Glorious Deeds of Pūrṇa: A Translation and Study of the Pūrṇāvadāna. Richmond: Curzon Press, 2000.

Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu. Buddhist Monastic Code II: The Khandaka Rules Translated & Explained. Valley Center: Metta Forest Monastery, 2001.

Thapar, Romila. A History of India. London: Penguin, 1990.

Tripāṭhī, C., ed. Fünfundwanzig Sūtras des Nidānasaṃyukta (Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden VIII). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1962.

Tsedroen, Bhikṣuṇī Jampa and Bhikkhu Anālayo. “The Gurudharma on Bhikṣuṇī Ordination in the Mūla­sarvāsti­vāda Tradition.” The Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20 (2013): 743–74. Retrieved on 20 April 2014 from http://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/

Vogel, Claus. The Teachings of the Six Heretics According to the Pravrajyāvastu of the Tibetan Mūla­sarvāsti­vāda Vinaya. Wiesbaden: Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft, 1970.

Von Hinüber, Oskar (1996). A Handbook of Pāli Literature. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1996.

‍—‍—‍—(2014). “The Gilgit Manuscripts: An Ancient Buddhist Library in Modern Research.” In From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 79-135. Wien: Österreichische Akademie Der Wissenschaften, 2014.

Walshe, Maurice. The Long Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Dīgha Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1995.

Ware, James R. “The Preamble to the Saṃgha­rakṣitāvadāna.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 3 (1): 47-67

White, David Gordon. The Alchemical Body: Siddha Traditions in Medieval India. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Wu, Juan. “Stories of King Bimbisāra and His Son Ajātaśatru in the Cīvaravastu of the Mūla­sarvāsti­vāda-Vinaya and Some Śvetāmbara Jaina Texts.” Studies in Indian Philosophy and Buddhism, 21 (March 2014): 19–47.

Yamagiwa, Nobuyuki, ed. Das Pāṇḍulohitaka­vastu: über die verschiedenen Verfarensweisen der Bestrafung in der buddhistischen Gemeinde: Neuasgabe der Sanskrit-Hanschrift aus Gilgit, tibetischer Text und deutsche Übersetzung. Bonn: Indica-et-Tibetica-Verlag, 2001.

Yao, Fumi. The Bhaiṣajya­vastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya (『根本説一切有部律 薬 事) (Annotated Japanese translation from the Tibetan translation of the Sanskrit original with introduction; comparative table of the extant materials in Sanskrit, Tibetan, and Chinese; and index). Tokyo: Rengo Shuppan, 2013.

Zwilling, Leonard. “Homosexuality as Seen in Indian Buddhist Texts.” In Buddhism, Sexuality, and Gender, edited by José Ignacio Cabezón, 203–15. New York: State University of New York Press, 1992.


g.

Glossary

Types of attestation for Sanskrit names and terms

AS

Attested in source text

This term is attested in the Sanskrit manuscript used as a source for this translation.

AO

Attested in other text

This term is attested in other Sanskrit manuscripts of the Kangyur or Tengyur.

AD

Attested in dictionary

This term is attested in Tibetan-Sanskrit dictionaries.

AA

Approximate attestation

The attestation of this name is approximate. It is based on other names where Tibetan-Sanskrit relationship is attested in dictionaries or other manuscripts.

RP

Reconstruction from Tibetan phonetic rendering

This term is a reconstruction based on the Tibetan phonetic rendering of the term.

RS

Reconstruction from Tibetan semantic rendering

This term is a reconstruction based on the semantics of the Tibetan translation.

SU

Source Unspecified

This term has been supplied from an unspecified source, which most often is a widely trusted dictionary.

g.­1

abandoned the five branches

  • yan lag lnga spangs pa
  • ཡན་ལག་ལྔ་སྤངས་པ།
  • —

Buddhas have abandoned five branches or factors that perpetuate saṃsāra: pursuing desires, ill will, lethargy and languor, regret and agitation, and view and doubt.

1 passage contains this term:

  • 1.­280
g.­2

Abode of Tuṣita

  • dga’ ldan gyi gnas
  • དགའ་ལྡན་གྱི་གནས།
  • tuṣitabhavana

One of the heavens of Buddhist cosmology, counted among the six heavens of the desire realm, it is home of future Buddha Maitreya.

2 passages contain this term:

  • 1.­2
  • 1.­10
g.­3

abscesses

  • shu ba
  • ཤུ་བ།
  • dardru
  • dardrū

Symptom that may be evidence of an illness considered an impediment to ordination.

See also n.­126.

2 passages contain this term:

  • 1.­540
  • 1.­568
g.­6

account for

  • grangs dag ’debs
  • གྲངས་དག་འདེབས།
  • —

As in to account for the income and allocations of a monastery.

5 passages contain this term:

  • i.­28
  • 4.­145-146
  • 4.­156-157
g.­7

act

  • las
  • ལས།
  • karman

Matters that govern the saṅgha community’s daily life, regular observances (such as the rains retreat and the purification) and special events (like ordination) are ratified by a formal act of the saṅgha. There are one hundred and one such types of formal acts, all of which fall into one of three categories depending on the procedure needed for ratification. An act of motion alone requires only a motion; an act whose second member is a motion require a motion and the statement of the act; while an act whose fourth member is a motion require a motion and three statements of the act.

23 passages contain this term:

  • i.­9
  • p.­5
  • 1.­426
  • 1.­433
  • 1.­513-514
  • 1.­636
  • 5.­23
  • ap1.­1
  • n.­89
  • n.­193
  • g.­11
  • g.­14
  • g.­15
  • g.­60
  • g.­101
  • g.­172
  • g.­241
  • g.­263
  • g.­304
  • g.­305
  • g.­326
  • g.­329
g.­13

act of suspension

  • gnas nas dbyung ba’i las
  • གནས་ནས་དབྱུང་བའི་ལས།
  • utkṣepaṇīyakarman

One of five types of disciplinary acts meted out by the saṅgha. A monk may be suspended on one of seven grounds: failing to acknowledge an offense; refusing to amend or rehabilitate one’s behavior; deviant views; being overly belligerent and quarrelsome; creating the circumstances for a quarrel; maintaining overly close relations with nuns, unruly people, and ne’er-do-wells; and refusing to let go of a Dharma matter that has been peacefully resolved.

8 passages contain this term:

  • i.­9
  • p.­5
  • 1.­636
  • 5.­1
  • 5.­24
  • n.­198
  • g.­96
  • g.­101
g.­16

Āgama

  • lung
  • ལུང་།
  • āgama

The Mūlasarvāstivādin tradition grouped the Buddha’s early sūtra discourses into four divisions, or Āgama (Tib. mdo sde’i lung sde bzhi): the Dīrghāgama (Tib. lung ring po), the Madhyamāgama (Tib. lung bar ma), the Ekottarikāgama (Tib. lung gcig las ’phros pa), and the Saṃyuktāgama(Tib. lung dag ldan /yang dar par ldan pa’i lung). They are more familiar to many English-speaking Buddhists through the translations of their Pali correlates: the Dīgha Nikāya, Majjhima Nikāya, Aṅguttara Nikāya, and the Samyutta Nikā